A COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVE TESTS FOR THE 2X2 COMPARATIVE TRIAL

[1] BARNARD GA, 1949, J ROY STAT SOC B, V11, P115

[2] SIGNIFICANCE TESTS FOR 2X2 TABLES [J]. BIOMETRIKA, 1947, 34 (1-2) : 123 - 138

[3] IN CONTRADICTION TO BERKSON,J. DISPRAISE - CONDITIONAL TESTS CAN BE MORE EFFICIENT [J]. JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 1979, 3 (03) : 181 - 187

[4] 2X2 TABLES - A NOTE ON PEARSON,E.S. PAPER [J]. BIOMETRIKA, 1947, 34 (1-2) : 168 - 169

[5] Properties of sufficiency and statistical tests [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF LONDON SERIES A-MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES, 1937, 160 (A901) : 0268 - 0282

[6] IN DISPRAISE OF THE EXACT TEST - DISCUSSION [J]. JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 1979, 3 (03) : 189 - 192

[7] BERKSON J, 1978, J STAT PLAN INFER, V2, P27, DOI 10.1016/0378-3758(78)90019-8

[8] TESTING FOR ASSOCIATION IN 2X2 CONTINGENCY-TABLES WITH VERY SMALL SAMPLE SIZES [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1979, 86 (05) : 1011 - 1014

[9] THE CHI-2 TEST OF GOODNESS OF FIT [J]. ANNALS OF MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS, 1952, 23 (03): : 315 - 345

[10] SOME REASONS FOR NOT USING YATES CONTINUITY CORRECTION ON 2X2 CONTINGENCY-TABLES [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1974, 69 (346) : 374 - 376

[1] BARNARD GA, 1949, J ROY STAT SOC B, V11, P115

[2] SIGNIFICANCE TESTS FOR 2X2 TABLES [J]. BIOMETRIKA, 1947, 34 (1-2) : 123 - 138

[3] IN CONTRADICTION TO BERKSON,J. DISPRAISE - CONDITIONAL TESTS CAN BE MORE EFFICIENT [J]. JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 1979, 3 (03) : 181 - 187

[4] 2X2 TABLES - A NOTE ON PEARSON,E.S. PAPER [J]. BIOMETRIKA, 1947, 34 (1-2) : 168 - 169

[5] Properties of sufficiency and statistical tests [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF LONDON SERIES A-MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES, 1937, 160 (A901) : 0268 - 0282

[6] IN DISPRAISE OF THE EXACT TEST - DISCUSSION [J]. JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 1979, 3 (03) : 189 - 192

[7] BERKSON J, 1978, J STAT PLAN INFER, V2, P27, DOI 10.1016/0378-3758(78)90019-8

[8] TESTING FOR ASSOCIATION IN 2X2 CONTINGENCY-TABLES WITH VERY SMALL SAMPLE SIZES [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1979, 86 (05) : 1011 - 1014

[9] THE CHI-2 TEST OF GOODNESS OF FIT [J]. ANNALS OF MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS, 1952, 23 (03): : 315 - 345

[10] SOME REASONS FOR NOT USING YATES CONTINUITY CORRECTION ON 2X2 CONTINGENCY-TABLES [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1974, 69 (346) : 374 - 376