TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION-EVOKED INHIBITION OF VOLUNTARY MUSCLE-ACTIVITY (SILENT PERIOD) IS IMPAIRED IN PATIENTS WITH ISCHEMIC HEMISPHERIC LESION

被引:39
作者
BRAUNE, HJ [1 ]
FRITZ, C [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV MARBURG,DEPT NEUROL,MARBURG,GERMANY
关键词
CEREBRAL ISCHEMIA; TRANSIENT; MOTOR ACTIVITY; STIMULATION; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC; STROKE ASSESSMENT;
D O I
10.1161/01.STR.26.4.550
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Purpose Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex is well established as a valuable method for noninvasive examination of the central motor system. In addition to exciting corticospinal cells and evoking a direct motor response, the magnetic stimulus delivered during voluntary activity produces a prolonged postexcitatory inhibition (silent period) of activity. We investigated silent period changes in patients with ischemic stroke of different clinical degrees. Methods Standardized transcranial magnetic stimulation during sustained muscle contraction was performed at the vertex. Electromyographic activity was recorded via surface electrodes placed over the abductor digiti minimi muscle on both sides. We examined 50 patients with stroke (divided into three subgroups according to the degree of impairment) and 50 healthy control subjects. Results In the control group we found no statistically significant interside difference in the duration of the silent period, whereas a marked interindividual variation was found. In patients with prior minor stroke who showed no residual motor disturbance, we found a significant prolongation of the postexcitatory inhibition recorded from the affected side compared with the healthy side. This interside discrepancy was even more pronounced in patients with minor hemiparesis and patients with moderate hemiparesis. Conclusions Our findings suggest that the measurement of the silent period elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation is a useful and sensitive neurophysiological parameter in the management of stroke. Particularly in the subgroup of patients with no residual clinical signs of central motor impairment, it is capable of detecting subclinical motor function disturbances.
引用
收藏
页码:550 / 553
页数:4
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] ELECTRICAL AND MAGNETIC TRANSCRANIAL STIMULATION IN PATIENTS WITH CORTICOSPINAL DAMAGE DUE TO STROKE OR MOTOR-NEURON DISEASE
    BERARDELLI, A
    INGHILLERI, M
    CRUCCU, G
    MERCURI, B
    MANFREDI, M
    [J]. ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1991, 81 (05): : 389 - 396
  • [2] LATENCY AND DURATION OF THE MUSCLE SILENT PERIOD FOLLOWING TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION IN MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS, CEREBRAL-ISCHEMIA, AND OTHER UPPER MOTONEURON LESIONS
    HAUG, BA
    KUKOWSKI, B
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 1994, 44 (05) : 936 - 940
  • [3] SILENT PERIOD MEASUREMENT REVIVES AS A VALUABLE DIAGNOSTIC-TOOL WITH TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION
    HAUG, BA
    SCHONLE, PW
    KNOBLOCH, C
    KOHNE, M
    [J]. ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1992, 85 (02): : 158 - 160
  • [4] INGHILLERI M, 1993, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V466, P521
  • [5] CLINICAL-VALUE OF MAGNETIC STIMULATION IN STROKE
    KANDLER, RH
    JARRATT, JA
    VENABLES, GS
    [J]. CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 1991, 1 (04) : 239 - 244
  • [6] KUKOWSKI B, 1992, Electromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology, V32, P373
  • [7] THE SILENT PERIOD PRODUCED BY ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION OF MIXED PERIPHERAL-NERVES
    LEIS, AA
    ROSS, MA
    EMORI, T
    MATSUE, Y
    SAITO, T
    [J]. MUSCLE & NERVE, 1991, 14 (12) : 1202 - 1208
  • [8] Marsden C D, 1983, Adv Neurol, V39, P387
  • [9] ROICK H, 1993, ELECTROENCEPHALOGR C, V87
  • [10] NONINVASIVE ELECTRICAL AND MAGNETIC STIMULATION OF THE BRAIN, SPINAL-CORD AND ROOTS - BASIC PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES FOR ROUTINE CLINICAL-APPLICATION - REPORT OF AN IFCN COMMITTEE
    ROSSINI, PM
    BARKER, AT
    BERARDELLI, A
    CARAMIA, MD
    CARUSO, G
    CRACCO, RQ
    DIMITRIJEVIC, MR
    HALLETT, M
    KATAYAMA, Y
    LUCKING, CH
    DENOORDHOUT, ALM
    MARSDEN, CD
    MURRAY, NMF
    ROTHWELL, JC
    SWASH, M
    TOMBERG, C
    [J]. ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 91 (02): : 79 - 92