THE CCK(A) RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST DEVAZEPIDE DOES NOT MODIFY OPIOID SELF-ADMINISTRATION OR DRUG DISCRIMINATION - COMPARISON WITH THE DOPAMINE ANTAGONIST HALOPERIDOL

被引:31
作者
HIGGINS, GA
JOHARCHI, N
WANG, Y
CORRIGALL, WA
SELLERS, EM
机构
[1] UNIV TORONTO,ADDICT RES FDN,TORONTO M5S 1A1,ONTARIO,CANADA
[2] UNIV TORONTO,DEPT PHARMACOL,TORONTO M5S 1A1,ONTARIO,CANADA
[3] UNIV TORONTO,DEPT PHYSIOL,TORONTO M5S 1A1,ONTARIO,CANADA
[4] UNIV TORONTO,DEPT MED,TORONTO M5S 1A1,ONTARIO,CANADA
关键词
CHOLECYSTOKININ; OPIOID; HEROIN SELF-ADMINISTRATION; MORPHINE DRUG DISCRIMINATION; DEVAZEPIDE; L365-260; DOPAMINE; HALOPERIDOL;
D O I
10.1016/0006-8993(94)91880-5
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
We previously reported that the selective cholecystokinin(A) (CCK(A)) receptor antagonist, devazepide, blocked the acquisition of a morphine conditioned place preference (ref 28). An interpretation of this finding is that devazepide may either affect an opioid discriminative stimulus and/or modify the rewarding properties of opioids. The present study was designed to investigate these issues by determining the effect of equivalent doses of devazepide in a morphine drug discrimination paradigm and a model of heroin self-administration. In each case, devazepide (0.001-1 mg/kg) was ineffective, i.e there was no antagonism of a morphine discriminative cue, and in a separate group of rats trained to self-administer heroin (0.03 mg/kg/infusion, FR5 schedule, 1h per day), devazepide did not alter the pattern of heroin responding. Because of evidence implicating an interaction between accumbens CCK and dopamine (DA) systems and evidence suggesting an apparent differential involvement of DA in opioid place conditioning, self-administration and drug discrimination behaviour, the effect of the DA antagonist haloperidol was examined in the latter two paradigms. In each test, haloperidol produced an effect inconsistent with a direct DAergic involvement. In a final study the CCK(B) antagonist L365-260 was also found not to affect an opioid discriminative cue. The present results therefore cast doubt on the potential utility of selective CCK(A) antagonists as treatments for opioid abuse, and further suggest that CCK(B) antagonists may not potentiate the subjective effects of opioids, an important finding considering that such drugs have been proposed as adjuncts to opioid therapy for the treatment of pain relief.
引用
收藏
页码:246 / 254
页数:9
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]   BRAIN CCK-B RECEPTORS MEDIATE THE SUPPRESSION OF DOPAMINE RELEASE BY CHOLECYSTOKININ [J].
ALTAR, CA ;
BOYAR, WC .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 1989, 483 (02) :321-326
[2]  
BALSKUBIK R, 1993, J PHARMACOL EXP THER, V264, P489
[3]  
BALSTER R L, 1990, Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, V10, p31S
[4]  
BALSTER RL, 1991, BRIT J ADDICT, V86, P1549
[5]   HEROIN REWARD IS DEPENDENT ON A DOPAMINERGIC SUBSTRATE [J].
BOZARTH, MA ;
WISE, RA .
LIFE SCIENCES, 1981, 29 (18) :1881-1886
[6]  
Carr H.C., 1989, NEUROPHARMACOLOGICAL
[8]   FENTANYL AND APOMORPHINE - ASYMMETRICAL GENERALIZATION OF DISCRIMINATIVE STIMULUS PROPERTIES [J].
COLPAERT, FC ;
NIEMEGEERS, CJE ;
JANSSEN, PAJ .
NEUROPHARMACOLOGY, 1976, 15 (09) :541-545
[9]   NARCOTIC CUE AND NARCOTIC STATE [J].
COLPAERT, FC .
LIFE SCIENCES, 1977, 20 (07) :1097-1108
[10]   SELECTIVE D1-DOPAMINE AND D2-DOPAMINE ANTAGONISTS DECREASE RESPONSE RATES OF FOOD-MAINTAINED BEHAVIOR AND REDUCE THE DISCRIMINATIVE STIMULUS PRODUCED BY HEROIN [J].
CORRIGALL, WA ;
COEN, KM .
PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR, 1990, 35 (02) :351-355