A comparison of the bronchodilating effects of salmeterol, salbutamol and ipratropium bromide in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

被引:45
作者
Matera, MG
Cazzola, M
Vinciguerra, A
DiPerna, F
Calderaro, F
Caputi, M
Rossi, F
机构
[1] A CARDARELLI HOSP,DEPT PNEUMOL,RESP CLIN PHARMACOL UNIT,NAPLES,ITALY
[2] SECOND NEAPOLITAN UNIV,INST PHARMACOL & TOXICOL,NAPLES,ITALY
[3] SECOND NEAPOLITAN UNIV,INST PULM DIS,SCH MED,NAPLES,ITALY
来源
PULMONARY PHARMACOLOGY | 1995年 / 8卷 / 06期
关键词
salmeterol; salbutamol; ipratropium bromide; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease;
D O I
10.1006/pulp.1995.1036
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Bronchodilator efficacy of salbutamol (200 mu g), salmeterol (50 mu g) and ipratropium bromide (40 mu g) aerosols has been compared in 16 patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) using a double-blind placebo controlled cross-over design. When absolute changes in FEV(1) were used as the response criterion, efficacy of the three drugs was significantly better than placebo (P<0.05). The onset of bronchodilatation after ipratropium bromide was slower than after salbutamol, but ipratropium induced more and longer-lasting bronchodilatation than the adrenergic drug. Salmeterol was slower but its duration was longer than salbutamol. The onset of the effect of salmeterol was slower than ipratropium bromide, but salmeterol showed, on average, superior bronchodilator efficacy compared with the anticholinergic agent, sustaining bronchodilation longer than ipratropium bromide (responses to salmeterol were significantly (P<0.05) greater than those to ipratropium bromide from 4-12 h time period, but from 15 min to 1 h time periods response to ipratropium bromide exceeded salmeterol). The mean FEV(1) area under the curve was significantly (P<0.05) larger after salmeterol when compared to ipratropium bromide and salbutamol. Moreover, the mean FEV(1) area under the curve after ipratropium bromide was significantly (P<0.05) higher than that after salbutamol. In any case, our data showed individual differences in patient response. We conclude that salmeterol compares favourably with ipratropium bromide in terms of effects on lung function at clinically recommended doses because it has a longer duration of action than ipratropium bromide. The longer dosing intervals, which may enhance compliance, encourage its administration in patients with COPD. (C) 1995 Academic Press Limited
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 271
页数:5
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Ferguson G.T., Chemiack R.M., Management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, N Engl J Med, 320, pp. 1017-1022, (1993)
[2]  
Humphreys D.M., Is cholinergic tone pathological in chronic airflow obstruction?, Res Clin Forums, 13, pp. 7-13, (1991)
[3]  
Donohue J.F., Management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Curr Opin Pulm Med, 1, pp. 129-143, (1995)
[4]  
Hughes J.A., Tobin M.J., Bellamy D., Hutchison D.C.S., Effect of ipratropium bromide and albuterol in pulmonary emphysema, Thorax, 37, pp. 667-670, (1982)
[5]  
Schultze-Weminghaus G., Multicenter 1-year trail on formoterol, a new long-acting beta2-agonist, in chronic obstructive airway disease, Lung, 168, pp. 83-89, (1990)
[6]  
Deltorre L., Melica E.V., Deltorre M., Effectiveness of salmeterol in patients with emphysema, Curr Ther Res, 52, pp. 888-898, (1992)
[7]  
Germouty J., Aubert J., Clavier J., Paramelle B., Voisin C., Tolerance a long terme du Formoterol chez des bronchopathes chroniques obstructifs, Allerg Immunol, 24, pp. 342-347, (1992)
[8]  
Schultze-Weminghaus G., Trautmann M., Haus E., Comparison of salmeterol with the combination of fenoterol and ipratropium bromide in patients with obstructive respiratory tract diseases, Atemwegs-Lungenkrankh, 19, (1993)
[9]  
Cazzola M., Santangelo G., Piccolo A., Salzillo A., Matera M.G., D'amato G., Rossi F., Effect of salmeterol and formoterol in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Pulm Pharmacol, 70, pp. 103-107, (1994)
[10]  
Petrie G.R., Palmer K.N.V., Comparison of aerosol ipratropium bromide and salbutamol in chronic bronchitis and asthma, Br Med J, 1, pp. 430-432, (1975)