EGALITARIANISM, SUBSISTENCE PROVISION, AND WORK INCENTIVES IN CHINA AGRICULTURAL COLLECTIVES

被引:30
作者
KUNG, JK
机构
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0305-750X(94)90068-X
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Collective agriculture in China failed because its reward system was too egalitarian to provide sufficient work incentives to the peasants. A popular view attributes egalitariansim to the difficulties of monitoring work effort in a team. An alternative view, presented here, argues that: (a) the egalitarian provision of ''basic'' foodgrains to peasant households reflected more generally the consumption problem of the peasantry who were impoverished by the state's policy of extracting agriculture; and (b) as a remuneration system time rates better served the work-and-income-sharing purpose than piece-rates and therefore better protected households with high dependency ratios. Egalitarianism survives under the household farming system.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 187
页数:13
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
ALCHIAN AA, 1972, AM ECON REV, V62, P777
[2]   SUPERVISION AND EFFICIENCY IN SOCIALIZED AGRICULTURE [J].
BRADLEY, ME ;
CLARK, MG .
SOVIET STUDIES, 1972, 23 (03) :465-473
[3]  
Chan Anita, 1984, CHEN VILLAGE RECENT
[4]  
CHANG CC, 1975, EXERCISING ALL ROUND
[5]  
CHEN J, 1991, CHINAS RURAL SURPLUS
[6]  
CHEN NR, 1980, AGR DEV CHINA JAPAN
[7]  
*CHIN LAND ISS STU, 1992, CHANG LAND I VILL LE
[8]  
*CHIN MIN AGR, 1991, 910 INT REP
[9]  
CROLL E, 1983, FAMILY RICE BOWL FOO
[10]  
Donnithorne A., 1972, CHINA QUART, V52, P605, DOI [10.1017/S0305741000048116, DOI 10.1017/S0305741000048116]