EFFECT OF PROTECTIVE SHIELDS ON DRIFT AND DEPOSITION CHARACTERISTICS OF FIELD SPRAYERS

被引:47
作者
WOLF, TM
GROVER, R
WALLACE, K
SHEWCHUK, SR
MAYBANK, J
机构
[1] AGVIRON CONSULTING,SASKATOON,SK,CANADA
[2] SASKATCHEWAN RES COUNCIL,SASKATOON S7N 2X8,SK,CANADA
关键词
2,4-D AMINE; DROPLET DRIFT; ASPIRATED AIR SAMPLERS; FLAT FAN TIPS; DEPOSITION UNIFORMITY; DROPLET SIZE;
D O I
10.4141/cjps93-165
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Field trials were conducted to determine the effectiveness of shields in reducing off-target droplet drift from ground-rig sprayers. Sprayer booms ranging in width from 10 to 13.5 m and equipped with commercially available shields were operated along a 150-m swath in a field of approximately 20-cm-tall spring wheat in wind speeds ranging from 10 to 35 km h-1. Airborne drift was measured using aspirated air samplers. The use of an 80-degrees flat fan tip (8001) at a pressure of 275 kpa and a ground speed of 8 km h-1 resulted in 7.5% of the 50 L ha-1 spray solution drifting off the target area. The use of protective cones with 8001 tips without lowering the boom reduced airborne drift by 33% at a 20 km h-1 wind speed, while a 65-85% drift reduction was accomplished with the combination of solid or perforated shielding and lowering the sprayer boom. Increasing the application rate to 100 L ha-1 by using 8002 tips reduced drift of the unshielded sprayer by 65%. Decreasing application rate to 15 L ha-1 by using 800017 tips increased drift by 29% despite the use of a shield. Off-target drift increased with increasing wind speeds for all sprayers, but the increase was less for shielded sprayers and coarser sprays. The decreased droplet size of spray from 110-degrees tips increased drift when the boom height was the same as for 80-degrees tips. High wind speeds, lower carrier volumes and finer sprays, 110-degrees tips, and solid shields tended to decrease on-swath deposit uniformity, whereas a perforated shield or cones did not affect deposit uniformity.
引用
收藏
页码:1261 / 1273
页数:13
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
BODE LE, 1976, T ASAE, V19, P213, DOI 10.13031/2013.35997
[2]   SPRAY RECOVERY FROM NOZZLES DESIGNED TO REDUCE DRIFT [J].
BOUSE, LF ;
CARLTON, JB ;
MERKLE, MG .
WEED SCIENCE, 1976, 24 (04) :361-365
[3]  
Edwards C. J., 1953, P BRIT WEED CONTROL, P348
[4]  
FEHRINGER RJ, 1990, ASAE901008 AM SOC AG
[5]  
GOERING CE, 1975, T ASAE, V18, P27, DOI 10.13031/2013.36518
[6]   FIELD MEASUREMENT OF DROPLET DRIFT FROM GROUND SPRAYERS .1. SAMPLING, ANALYTICAL, AND DATA INTEGRATION TECHNIQUES [J].
GROVER, R ;
KERR, LA ;
MAYBANK, J ;
YOSHIDA, K .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 1978, 58 (03) :611-622
[7]  
JOHNSTONE DR, 1978, BRIT CROP PROTECTION, V22, P43
[8]  
MAYBANK J, 1969, Transactions of the ASAE (American Society of Agricultural Engineers), V12, P759
[9]   DROPLET SIZE SPECTRA, DRIFT POTENTIAL, AND GROUND DEPOSITION PATTERN OF HERBICIDE SPRAYS [J].
MAYBANK, J ;
YOSHIDA, K ;
GROVER, R .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 1974, 54 (03) :541-546
[10]  
MAYBANK J, 1991, CANADIAN AGR ENG, V32, P235