CONTINUITY OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY IN A COMMUNITY SAMPLE OF ADOLESCENTS

被引:98
作者
ORVASCHEL, H
LEWINSOHN, PM
SEELEY, JR
机构
[1] OREGON RES INST, EUGENE, OR 97403 USA
[2] NOVA SE UNIV, CHILD ADOLESCENT DEPRESS PROGRAM, FT LAUDERDALE, FL USA
关键词
ADOLESCENT PSYCHOPATHOLOGY; CONTINUITY;
D O I
10.1097/00004583-199511000-00020
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
Objective: To examine the continuity between the primary (first) diagnosis and secondary (second) diagnosis of those adolescents who have more than one episode of psychiatric disorder. Data were examined to determine whether the second episode ''breeds true'' (i.e., remains within the same diagnostic category as the first) or involves a different disorder. Method: The sample consisted of 236 youngsters selected from the larger (n = 1,507) population of adolescents (aged 14 through 18 years) from the Oregon Adolescent Depression Project who had been assessed on two occasions, approximately 1 year apart. Results: Results support the continuity hypothesis for the categories of disorder studied (major depression, anxiety, disruptive, substance use), with the exception of dysthymia. Primary dysthymia did not result in the diagnosis of secondary dysthymia, because most adolescents who had dysthymia had not recovered within the time frame of the study and were chronic cases, often with secondary anxiety. Also presented are data on age of onset of disorder (lowest for anxiety and highest for substance use) and information on remission intervals between episodes (well time) (lowest for substance use and highest for anxiety). Conclusions: The findings are interpreted as providing support for the ''breed true'' hypothesis, although clearly not all second episodes are identical with the first. While the psychosocial factors examined did not predict the nature of the second disorder, this clearly needs further study.
引用
收藏
页码:1525 / 1535
页数:11
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Achenbach TM, 1987, MANUAL YOUTH SELF RE
[2]  
American Psychiatric Association, 1987, DIAGNOSTIC STAT MANU, V3rd
[3]  
American Psychiatric Association, 1994, DIAGNOSTIC STAT MANU, V4th
[4]   DISTINCTIONS BETWEEN SOCIAL SUPPORT CONCEPTS, MEASURES, AND MODELS [J].
BARRERA, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 14 (04) :413-445
[5]  
BERSCHEID E, 1973, PSYCHOL TODAY, V7, P119
[6]   STABILITY AND NATURAL-HISTORY OF DSM-III CHILDHOOD DIAGNOSES [J].
CANTWELL, DP ;
BAKER, L .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 1989, 28 (05) :691-700
[7]  
CLARIZIO HF, 1989, ADOLESCENCE, V24, P253
[8]   A COEFFICIENT OF AGREEMENT FOR NOMINAL SCALES [J].
COHEN, J .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1960, 20 (01) :37-46
[9]  
Everitt B., 1977, ANAL CONTINGENCY TAB
[10]   AN ANALYSIS OF COPING IN A MIDDLE-AGED COMMUNITY SAMPLE [J].
FOLKMAN, S ;
LAZARUS, RS .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL BEHAVIOR, 1980, 21 (03) :219-239