DIRECT OBSERVATIONS OF OWLS AND HETEROMYID RODENTS - CAN PREDATION RISK EXPLAIN MICROHABITAT USE

被引:291
作者
LONGLAND, WS [1 ]
PRICE, MV [1 ]
机构
[1] USDA ARS, RENO, NV 89512 USA
关键词
CHAETODIPUS; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; DESERT RODENTS; DIPODOMYS; FORAGING ECONOMICS; MICRODIPODOPS; MICROHABITAT; MOONLIGHT; OWLS; RISK-FORAGING TRADE-OFF;
D O I
10.2307/1941576
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Coexisting heteromyid rodent species of North American deserts differ in habitat use and in locomotory morphology. Quadrupedal species forage primarily in structurally complex microhabitats, such as under bush canopies, while bipedal species forage in open spaces. A common explanation for this morphology-microhabitat association is that species differing in morphology also differ in vulnerability to predators, that microhabitat structure affects predation risk, and that animals preferentially forage in the safest microhabitats. We tested this for two bipedal and two quadrupedal heteromyid species (matched by body size), and one cricetid species, by quantifying effects of habitat and illumination on activity and on risk of predation by Great Homed Owls. Capture frequencies were lower for all heteromyid species than for the cricetid species, Peromyscus maniculatus. Heteromyid activity was lower in open habitat and under bright illumination. Illumination had no significant effect on risk, perhaps because rodents changed activity patterns under full moon to compensate for a potential increment in risk. Habitat, however, did affect fisk: all species were attacked and captured more frequently in the open. Bipedal species were attacked relatively more in the open than were quadrupeds. If these results apply to all predators, they indicate that predation alone cannot account for the divergent microhabitat associations of bipedal and quadrupedal species. Bipedal heteromyids, however, escaped owl attacks more frequently than did quadrupeds of equivalent size. It is therefore conceivable that they experience lower overall risk in nature, where owls may preferentially attack more easily captured prey species when given a choice. Under these circumstances, owl predation could reinforce divergent microhabitat specializations based on some other factor, such as foraging economics, by restricting quadrupeds more strongly than bipeds to the safety of bushes.
引用
收藏
页码:2261 / 2273
页数:13
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   A DETERMINATION OF THE ENERGETIC EQUIVALENCE OF THE RISK OF PREDATION [J].
ABRAHAMS, MV ;
DILL, LM .
ECOLOGY, 1989, 70 (04) :999-1007
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1956, NONPARAMETRIC STAT B
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1976, DECISIONS MULTIPLE O
[4]   LOCOMOTION IN KANGAROO RATS AND ITS ADAPTIVE SIGNIFICANCE [J].
BARTHOLOMEW, GA ;
CASWELL, HH .
JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY, 1951, 32 (02) :155-169
[5]  
Blair W. Frank, 1943, JOUR WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, V7, P92, DOI 10.2307/3795783
[6]   SEED REMOVAL EXPERIMENTS ON DESERT RODENTS - THE MICROHABITAT BY MOONLIGHT EFFECT [J].
BOWERS, MA .
JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY, 1988, 69 (01) :201-204
[7]   RESOURCE UTILIZATION AND COEXISTENCE OF SEED EATING DESERT RODENTS IN SAND DUNE HABITATS [J].
BROWN, JH ;
LIEBERMAN, GA .
ECOLOGY, 1973, 54 (04) :788-797
[8]   GRANIVORY IN DESERT ECOSYSTEMS [J].
BROWN, JH ;
REICHMAN, OJ ;
DAVIDSON, DW .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS, 1979, 10 :201-227
[9]   THE EFFECTS OF OWL PREDATION ON THE FORAGING BEHAVIOR OF HETEROMYID RODENTS [J].
BROWN, JS ;
KOTLER, BP ;
SMITH, RJ ;
WIRTZ, WO .
OECOLOGIA, 1988, 76 (03) :408-415
[10]   DESERT RODENT COMMUNITY STRUCTURE - A TEST OF 4 MECHANISMS OF COEXISTENCE [J].
BROWN, JS .
ECOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS, 1989, 59 (01) :1-20