VALIDITY AND REPRODUCIBILITY OF THE "COOPERATIVE-CATARACT-RESEARCH-GROUP (CCRG) CATARACT CLASSIFICATION-SYSTEM

被引:11
作者
CHYLACK, LT
ROSNER, B
GARNER, W
GIBLIN, F
WALDRON, W
WOLFE, J
LESKE, MC
WHITE, O
机构
[1] MASSACHUSETTS EYE & EAR INFIRM, HOWE LAB OPHTHALMOL, 243 CHARLES ST, BOSTON, MA 02114 USA
[2] HARVARD UNIV, SCH MED, BOSTON, MA 02115 USA
[3] COLUMBIA UNIV COLL PHYS & SURG, NEW YORK, NY 10032 USA
[4] OAKLAND UNIV, INST BIOL SCI, ROCHESTER, MI 48063 USA
[5] UNIV ROCHESTER, SCH MED, DEPT OPHTHALMOL, ROCHESTER, NY 14627 USA
[6] SUNY STONY BROOK, SCH MED, STONY BROOK, NY 11794 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0014-4835(85)90116-2
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 [眼科学];
摘要
The validity and reproducibility of the CCRG [Cooperative Cataract Research Group] cataract classification system was assessed. The validity of index classifications was assessed by computing sensitivities and pairwise interclass correlations between experienced and novice classifiers using the former''s classification as the standard. The number of unordered combinations of terms in the CCRG''s classification was reduced by combining cortical terms according to the CCRG''s accepted system of staged simplification. The number of combinations of terms at each stage is as follows: Stage I (> 1000); II (127); III (63); IV (15); V (7); VI and VII (3) and VIII (2). Excellent agreement was obtained between the experienced and novice classifiers for Stages VII and VIII of the classification, good agreement for Stages V and VI and poor agreement for Stages IV, III and II (sensitivities of 97, 96, 72, 59, 40, 24 and 20%, respectively). Good agreement was also achieved for the classifications of single lenticular regions, except for subcapsular regions. The intra- and interobserver reproducibility was assessed by computing the Kappa statistic to compare classifications between novice observers and compare repeat classifications made by the same observer by viewing the same cataract once on each of 3 different days. The novice classifiers had excellent intraobserver reproducibility for Stages VII and VIII (Kappas of 0.87 and 0.97, respectively), good reproducibility for Stages IV, V and VI (Kappas of 0.53, 0.62 and 0.62, respectively) and marginal reproducibility for stages II and III (Kappas of 0.39 and 0.40, respectively). The intraobserver reproducibility of the experienced classifier was superior to the others for virtually all characteristics with excellent reproducibility for Stages IV, V, VI, VII and VIII with Kappas of 0.79, 0.90, 1.0, 1.0 and 1.0, respectively and good reproducibility for Stages II and III (Kappas of 0.55 and 0.64, respectively). The simplified CCRG cataract classification system (Stages IV-VIII) passes the minimum standards for reproducibility. The performance of the experienced classifier far exceeds the minimum standards and indicates the feasibility of improving classifier performance with training and practice.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 147
页数:13
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]
BETTELHEIM FA, 1981, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V20, P348
[2]
CHYLACK LT, 1983, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V24, P424
[3]
CHYLACK LT, 1978, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V96, P888
[4]
CHYLACK LT, 1984, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V25, P166
[5]
CHYLACK LT, 1984, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V25, P174
[6]
CHYLACK LT, 1983, INVEST OPHTHALMOL S, V24, P33
[7]
LARGE SAMPLE STANDARD ERRORS OF KAPPA AND WEIGHTED KAPPA [J].
FLEISS, JL ;
COHEN, J ;
EVERITT, BS .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1969, 72 (05) :323-&
[8]
Fleiss JL, 1973, Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions
[9]
HARDING CV, 1982, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V23, P1
[10]
HARDING CV, 1983, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V24, P1194