LOW-DOSAGE CEFEPIME AS TREATMENT FOR SERIOUS BACTERIAL-INFECTIONS

被引:15
作者
GIAMARELLOU, H
机构
[1] 1st Department of Propedeutic Medicine, Athens University School of Medicine, Laiko General Hospital, Athens
关键词
D O I
10.1093/jac/32.suppl_B.123
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Since infection develops in significant numbers of hospitalized patients, the problem of resistance to third-generation cephalosporins is of increasing concern. We evaluated the efficacy of cefepime 1 g bd as treatment for acute, moderately severe bacterial infection in 239 hospitalized patients (mean age 60 years). Of these patients, 204 were evaluated clinically for urinary tract infection (UTI) (n = 90), lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) (n = 70), skin and soft tissue infection (S/STI) (n = 12) and bacteraemia which was associated with either UTI or LRTI (n = 32) but not included in the previously mentioned UTI and LRTI groups. Amongst the pathogens isolated (36 Gram-positive, 150 Gram-negative), the most predominant species were Escherichia coli in UTI and bacteraemia (n = 8I), Streptococcus pneumoniae in LRTI and bacteraemia (n = 23). Haemophilus influenzae in LRTI (n = 16), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 4) and Enterobacter cloacae (n = 2) in S/STI. The mean duration of treatment was 8.5 days and was the same for the 204 clinically evaluable patients. Overall, the clinical cure rate for cefepime was 94% (191/204) Pathogen eradication was achieved in 93% (185/199) of infections. Of the patients with associated bacteraemia, the clinical cure rate was 97% (31/32) and 94% (16/17) of the pathogens were eradicated. Cefepime therapy was well-tolerated. Treatment was discontinued in eight patients (3%) because of local intolerance and in five patients (2%) because of drug-related adverse events (rash, headache and pruritus). Cefepime 1 g bd is as safe and effective as other parenteral cephalosporins for the treatment of acute bacterial UTI, LRTI and S/STI. including those cases with associated bacteraemia. The bd dosing schedule and reported lack of cross-resistance with other cephalosporins against some species of aerobic Gram-negative bacilli make cefepime an attractive treatment option in hospitalized patients. © 1993 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotheraphy.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 132
页数:10
相关论文
共 7 条
[1]   DEFINITIONS FOR SEPSIS AND ORGAN FAILURE [J].
BONE, RC ;
SPRUNG, CL ;
SIBBALD, WJ .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1992, 20 (06) :724-726
[2]   ACTIVITY OF CEFEPIME AGAINST CEFTAZIDIME-RESISTANT AND CEFOTAXIME-RESISTANT GRAM-NEGATIVE BACTERIA AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO BETA-LACTAMASE LEVELS [J].
FUNGTOMC, J ;
DOUGHERTY, TJ ;
DEORIO, FJ ;
SIMICHJACOBSON, V ;
KESSLER, RE .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1989, 33 (04) :498-502
[3]   FREQUENCY OF INVITRO RESISTANCE OF PSEUDOMONAS-AERUGINOSA TO CEFEPIME, CEFTAZIDIME, AND CEFOTAXIME [J].
FUNGTOMC, J ;
HUCZKO, E ;
PEARCE, M ;
KESSLER, RE .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1988, 32 (09) :1443-1445
[4]   RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF CEFEPIME AND CEFTAZIDIME FOR TREATMENT OF SKIN, SURGICAL WOUND, AND COMPLICATED URINARY-TRACT INFECTIONS IN HOSPITALIZED SUBJECTS [J].
GENTRY, LO ;
RODRIGUEZGOMEZ, G .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1991, 35 (11) :2371-2374
[5]  
GIAMARELLOU H, 1987, DRUG EXP CLIN RES, V13, P149
[6]   COMPARISON OF A NEW CEPHALOSPORIN, BMY 28142, WITH OTHER BROAD-SPECTRUM BETA-LACTAM ANTIBIOTICS [J].
KESSLER, RE ;
BIES, M ;
BUCK, RE ;
CHISHOLM, DR ;
PURSIANO, TA ;
TSAI, YH ;
MISIEK, M ;
PRICE, KE ;
LEITNER, F .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1985, 27 (02) :207-216
[7]   DEVELOPMENT OF BETA-LACTAM RESISTANT ENTEROBACTER-CLOACAE IN MICE [J].
MARCHOU, B ;
MICHEAHAMZEHPOUR, M ;
LUCAIN, C ;
PECHERE, JC .
JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1987, 156 (02) :369-373