THE RELATIONSHIP OF HOSPITAL CHARACTERISTICS AND THE RESULTS OF PEER-REVIEW IN 6 LARGE STATES

被引:59
作者
KUHN, EM
HARTZ, AJ
GOTTLIEB, MS
RIMM, AA
机构
[1] Division of Biostatistics, Clinical Epidemiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
关键词
HOSPITAL CHARACTERISTICS; PEER REVIEW; PROBLEM RATE;
D O I
10.1097/00005650-199110000-00008
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
To determine which characteristics of hospitals may be related to a higher quality of care, the association of hospital characteristics with the outcomes of medical record review by state Peer Review Organizations (PROs) was studied. The two data sources were: 1) the AHA 1986 Annual Survey of Hospitals and 2) reviews completed between July 1987 through June 1988 from six large PROs. For each hospital the percentage of cases that failed physician review (the confirmed problem rate) was computed. Hospital characteristics evaluated included financial status, ownership, medical training technological sophistication, and size. The following characteristics were significantly associated with a lower confirmed problem rate: a higher occupancy rate, greater payroll expenses per bed, a higher proportion of physicians who were board-certified specialists, greater technological sophistication, a higher number of beds, a higher proportion of nurses who were registered, and membership in the Council of Teaching Hospitals. Public hospitals had higher problems rates than private not-for-profit hospitals. All characteristics significantly related to higher confirmed problem rates were also related to higher adjusted mortality rates in a previous study of 3,100 U.S. hospitals. The results suggest that hospital resources, including financial status, training of medical personnel, and availability of sophisticated equipment, are related to the quality of care provided by the hospital.
引用
收藏
页码:1028 / 1038
页数:11
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
BLUMBERG MS, 1987, HEALTH SERV RES, V21, P715
[2]   ADJUSTED HOSPITAL DEATH RATES - A POTENTIAL SCREEN FOR QUALITY OF MEDICAL-CARE [J].
DUBOIS, RW ;
BROOK, RH ;
ROGERS, WH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1987, 77 (09) :1162-1167
[3]  
EASTAUGH SR, 1986, HOSPITAL HLTH SERVIC, V6, P85
[4]   THE CONDITION OF THE LITERATURE ON DIFFERENCES IN HOSPITAL MORTALITY [J].
FINK, A ;
YANO, EM ;
BROOK, RH .
MEDICAL CARE, 1989, 27 (04) :315-336
[5]  
FLOOD AB, 1982, HEALTH SERV RES, V17, P341
[6]  
FLOOD AB, 1987, HOSPITAL STRUCTURE P
[7]  
FOTTLER MD, 1987, HOSP HEALTH SERV ADM, V32, P343
[8]   CASE MIX, COSTS, AND OUTCOMES - DIFFERENCES BETWEEN FACULTY AND COMMUNITY-SERVICES IN A UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL [J].
GARBER, AM ;
FUCHS, VR ;
SILVERMAN, JF .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1984, 310 (19) :1231-1237
[9]   THE IMPORTANCE OF SEVERITY OF ILLNESS IN ASSESSING HOSPITAL MORTALITY [J].
GREEN, J ;
WINTFELD, N ;
SHARKEY, P ;
PASSMAN, LJ .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1990, 263 (02) :241-246
[10]   FLAWS IN MORTALITY DATA - THE HAZARDS OF IGNORING COMORBID DISEASE [J].
GREENFIELD, S ;
ARONOW, HU ;
ELASHOFF, RM ;
WATANABE, D .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1988, 260 (15) :2253-2255