VICTIMS RESPONSES TO APOLOGIES - THE EFFECTS OF OFFENDER RESPONSIBILITY AND OFFENSE SEVERITY

被引:78
作者
BENNETT, M
EARWAKER, D
机构
[1] Department of Psychology, University of Dundee
关键词
D O I
10.1080/00224545.1994.9712196
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Because they impose constraints on those who receive them. apologies are seldom rejected (Bennett & Dewberry, in press). It was hypothesized that two variables. degree of offender responsibility and outcome severity, determine whether an apology is rejected. Subjects in Scotland role played the victim of a negative event in which offender responsibility and outcome severity were independently manipulated. The findings provided substantial support for the hypothesis.
引用
收藏
页码:457 / 464
页数:8
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]  
BENNETT M, IN PRESS CURRENT PSY
[2]   CHILDRENS REACTIONS TO APOLOGIES [J].
DARBY, BW ;
SCHLENKER, BR .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1982, 43 (04) :742-753
[3]   ATTRIBUTION OF RESPONSIBILITY TO THE SELF AND OTHER IN CHILDREN AND ADULTS [J].
FINCHAM, F ;
JASPARS, J .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1979, 37 (09) :1589-1602
[4]   On Face-Work An Analysis of Ritual Elements in Social Interaction [J].
Goffman, Erving .
PSYCHIATRY, 1955, 18 (03) :213-231
[5]   APOLOGY AS AGGRESSION CONTROL - ITS ROLE IN MEDIATING APPRAISAL OF AND RESPONSE TO HARM [J].
OHBUCHI, K ;
KAMEDA, M ;
AGARIE, N .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 56 (02) :219-227
[6]  
Schlenker B.R., 1980, IMPRESSION MANAGEMEN
[7]   THE USE OF APOLOGIES IN SOCIAL PREDICAMENTS [J].
SCHLENKER, BR ;
DARBY, BW .
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY, 1981, 44 (03) :271-278
[8]  
SCHLENKER BR, 1989, BRIT J SOC PSYCHOL, V28, P353
[9]  
Semin G.R., 1983, ACCOUNTABILITY CONDU