THE VALUE AND LIMITATIONS OF USING PROCESS MODELS TO DESCRIBE THE MANUFACTURING ORGANIZATION

被引:23
作者
BUSBY, JS
WILLIAMS, GM
机构
[1] The CIM Institute, Cranfield Institute of Technology, Bedford
[2] School of Industrial and Manufacturing Science, Cranfield Institute of Technology, Bedford
关键词
D O I
10.1080/00207549308956852
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Process models offer a systematic, well-defined way of representing the structure of a firm's manufacturing operations. They record the activities that are performed in order to achieve a well-defined purpose of some kind (especially a commercial one), together with the activities' inter-dependencies. In notations such as that of IDEF0 these models have a hierarchical decomposition, in which activities are successively decomposed into more detailed activities, connected by a pattern of constraints of various kinds. Process models can be used to substantiate a number of claims about the satisfactoriness of a firm's operating structures: claims that its activities can be carried out with a greater degree of concurrency, for instance, or that there are redundant or duplicated activities, or spans of control that do not match readily-identified processes. This paper describes a number of observations that were made about the practice of process modelling in an engineering firm. It discusses, in particular, the limited expressive power of process modelling notations, and the problems encountered when a normative approach is taken to the analysis of a model when the analysis refers to some notion of an ideal factory (such as a cellular organization).
引用
收藏
页码:2179 / 2194
页数:16
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
Bravoco R.R., Yadev S.B., A methodology to model the functional structure of an organisation, Computers in Industry, 6, 5, pp. 345-361, (1985)
[2]  
Bravoco R.R., Yadev S.B., A methodology to model the information structure of an organisation, Journal of Systems and Software, 5, pp. 59-71, (1985)
[3]  
Bravoco R.R., Yadev S.B., A methodology to model the dynamic structure of an organisation, Information Systems, 10, 3, pp. 299-317, (1985)
[4]  
Buchel A., Breuil D., Doumeingts G., Comparison of design methodologies, characteristics and deficiencies, Production Management Systems: Strategies and Tools for Design, pp. 17-32, (1984)
[5]  
Checkland P., Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, (1981)
[6]  
Hoare C., Communicating Sequential Processes, (1985)
[7]  
Van Koetsveld M.J., (1984)
[8]  
Mackulak G.T., High level planning and control: An IDEF0 analysis for airframe manufacture, Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 3, 2, pp. 121-133, (1984)
[9]  
Maji R.K., Tools for development of information systems in CIM, Advanced Manufacturing Engineering, 1, pp. 26-34, (1988)
[10]  
Ross D.T., Structured analysis (SA): A language for communicating ideas, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 3, 1, pp. 16-34, (1977)