EXPECTATIONS OF REASSURANCE INFLUENCE THE NATURE OF FEAR-STIMULATED ATTITUDE-CHANGE

被引:81
作者
GLEICHER, F [1 ]
PETTY, RE [1 ]
机构
[1] OHIO STATE UNIV,DEPT PSYCHOL,COLUMBUS,OH 43210
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0022-1031(92)90033-G
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
A study was conducted to examine fear as a determinant of the extent of processing of the arguments presented in an involving persuasive communication. Under baseline (low fear) conditions, subjects differentiated between strong and weak argument quality messages. Under moderate fear conditions, however, the effect of fear on argument processing was dependent on subjects' expectations of the reassurance that would be provided by the message. When subjects' expectations about the efficacy of the solution to be presented in the message were clearly positive, subjects evaluated the solution favorably and equivalently, whether it was supported by strong or weak arguments. When expectations were unclear, however, subjects evaluated the solution based on the quality of the arguments in the message. These results held whether the induced fear was relevant or irrelevant to the topic of the persuasive communication. © 1992.
引用
收藏
页码:86 / 100
页数:15
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
BARON RS, 1989, UNPUB FEAR SUPERFICI
[2]   A CONCEPTUALIZATION OF THREAT COMMUNICATIONS AND PROTECTIVE HEALTH BEHAVIOR [J].
BECK, KH ;
FRANKEL, A .
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY, 1981, 44 (03) :204-217
[3]  
CHAIKEN S, 1989, UNINTENDED THOUGHT L
[4]   EFFECTS OF EXTRANEOUS FEAR AROUSAL AND BIRTH ORDER ON ATTITUDE CHANGE [J].
HENDRICK, C ;
BORDEN, R .
PSYCHONOMIC SCIENCE, 1970, 18 (04) :225-226
[5]  
Janis IL, 1967, ADV EXPT SOCIAL PSYC, V3
[6]  
JEPSON C, 1990, J SOC BEHAV PERS, V5, P61
[7]  
LEIPPE MR, 1987, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V52, P269
[8]  
Leventhal H, 1970, ADV EXPT SOCIAL PSYC, V5
[9]  
LUNDY RM, 1967, J COMMUN, V27, P39
[10]   EFFECTS OF THREATENING AND REASSURING COMPONENTS OF FEAR APPEALS ON PHYSIOLOGICAL AND VERBAL MEASURES OF EMOTION AND ATTITUDES [J].
MEWBORN, CR ;
ROGERS, RW .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1979, 15 (03) :242-253