CONTRAST SENSITIVITY IN PATIENTS WITH A NEW TYPE OF MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR-LENS

被引：33

作者：

OLSEN, T

CORYDON, L

机构：

[1] Department of Ophthalmology, Vejle Sygehus, Vejle

来源：

JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY | 1990年 / 16卷 / 01期

关键词：

accommodation; cataract surgery; contrast sensitivity; diffraction; multifocal intraocular lens;

D O I：

10.1016/S0886-3350(13)80872-3

中图分类号：

R77 [眼科学];

学科分类号：

100212 ;

摘要：

Contrast sensitivity was measured in 13 pseudophakic eyes of ten patients who had a new type of diffractive multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) and compared with an age-matched control group with a conventional monofocal IOL. All selected cases had a postoperative follow-up of four to six months and a corrected visual acuity of 20/20 or better. For distance vision, no significant difference in contrast sensitivity could be found between the two groups, indicating an uncompromised distance focus of the multifocal IOL. For near vision, an overall decrease in the contrast sensitivity of 0.19 log units (mean value across the tested frequency from 1.5 to is cycles/deg) was found in the multifocal group when these patients were tested without near addition and compared with the controls with near addition (P < .05). This indicated the near focus of the nitiltifocal IOL to be somewhat less efficient than the far focus. We find these results promising for the new diffractive multifocal IOL. © 1990, American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：42 / 46

页数：5

共 10 条

[1]

Freeman MH, Stone J, A new diffractive bifocal contact lens, Trans Br Contact Lens Assoc, 4, pp. 15-22, (1987)

[2]

Hansen TE, Corydon L, New multifocal intraocular lens design, J Cataract Refract Surg, 16, pp. 38-41, (1990)

[3]

Ginsburg AP, A new contrast sensitivity vision test chart, Am J Optom Physiol Opt, 61, pp. 403-407, (1984)

[4]

Hollander M, Wolfe DA, Non-parametric Statistical Methods, (1973)

[5]

Pomerantzeff O, Pankratov MM, Wang G-J, Calculation of an IOL from the wide-angle optical model of the eye, Am Intra-Ocular Implant Soc J, 11, pp. 37-43, (1985)

[6]

Howe JW, Mitchell KW, Mahabaleswara M, Abdel-Khalek MN, Visual evoked potential latency and contrast sensitivity in patients with posterior chamber intraocular lens implants, Br J Ophthalmol, 70, pp. 890-894, (1986)

[7]

Weatherill J, Yap M, Contrast sensitivity in pseudophakia and aphakia, Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 6, pp. 297-301, (1986)

[8]

Owsley C, Gardner T, Sekuler R, Lieberman H, Role of the crystalline lens in the spatial vision loss of the elderly, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 26, pp. 1165-1170, (1985)

[9]

Furuskog P, Nilsson BY, Contrast sensitivity in patients with posterior chamber intraocular lens implants, Acta Ophthalmol, 66, pp. 438-444, (1988)

[10]

Olsen T, Theoretical, computer-assisted prediction versus SRK prediction of postoperative refraction after intraocular lens implantation, J Cataract Refract Surg, 13, pp. 146-150, (1987)

← 1 →