ASSESSMENT OF GLUCOSE-TOLERANCE TEST CRITERIA FOR DIAGNOSIS OF DIABETES IN CHINESE SUBJECTS

被引:26
作者
COCKRAM, CS
LAU, JTF
CHAN, AYW
WOO, J
SWAMINATHAN, R
机构
[1] CHINESE UNIV HONG KONG,DEPT MED,SHA TIN,HONG KONG
[2] CHINESE UNIV HONG KONG,DEPT CHEM PATHOL,SHA TIN,HONG KONG
关键词
D O I
10.2337/diacare.15.8.988
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE - To examine and compare WHO diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHOD - The relationship between FPG and 2-h glucose are examined in 680 OGTTs with a quadratic regression model and ROC analysis. Simultaneous measurements of HbA1 and fructosamine are also compared with multiple linear regression. RESULTS - Two hundred eighteen subjects (32%) had 2-h glucose greater-than-or-equal-to 11.1 mM, of which only 86 had FPG greater-than-or-equal-to 7.8 mM. Only 2 subjects had FPG > 7.8 mM and 2-h glucose < 7.8 mM. Of subjects with 2-h glucose < 7.8 mM (n = 332), only 9 had FPG > 6.0 mM. From the quadratic model, the predicted FPG corresponding to 2-h glucose = 11.1 mM was 5.7 mM, whereas the predicted 2-h glucose corresponding to FPG = 7.8 mM was 15.2 mM. ROC analysis showed that, with 2-h glucose greater-than-or-equal-to 11.1 mM as indicating diabetes, an FPG of 5.6 mM gave an intersect for sensitivity and specificity of 87%. HbA1 and fructosamine correlated more closely with 2-h glucose and area under the OGTT curve than with FPG. CONCLUSIONS - Given that a 2-h glucose cutoff of 11.1 mM can be justified from other studies, our results suggest that the FPG cutoff of 7.8 mM when used for screening purposes should be reduced. At a suggested value of 7.0 mM, specificity remains 98.5%, whereas sensitivity increases to 57%.
引用
收藏
页码:988 / 990
页数:3
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   EFFECT OF DELAY IN SEPARATING PLASMA FOR GLUCOSE MEASUREMENT UPON THE INTERPRETATION OF ORAL GLUCOSE-TOLERANCE TESTS [J].
CHAN, AYW ;
COCKRAM, CS ;
SWAMINATHAN, R .
ANNALS OF CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 1990, 27 :73-74
[2]   VARIABILITY OF CAPILLARY PLASMA-GLUCOSE IN HEALTHY-INDIVIDUALS IN REPEATED 75 G ORAL GLUCOSE-TOLERANCE TESTS [J].
CUMMINGS, ST ;
FRASER, CG .
ANNALS OF CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 1988, 25 :634-637
[3]   DETERMINING DIABETES PREVALENCE - A RATIONAL BASIS FOR THE USE OF FASTING PLASMA-GLUCOSE CONCENTRATIONS [J].
FINCH, CF ;
ZIMMET, PZ ;
ALBERTI, KGMM .
DIABETIC MEDICINE, 1990, 7 (07) :603-610
[4]   COMPARISON OF HBA1 AND FRUCTOSAMINE IN DIAGNOSIS OF GLUCOSE-TOLERANCE ABNORMALITIES [J].
GUILLAUSSEAU, PJ ;
CHARLES, MA ;
PAOLAGGI, F ;
TIMSIT, J ;
CHANSON, P ;
PEYNET, J ;
GODARD, V ;
ESCHWEGE, E ;
ROUSSELET, F ;
LUBETZKI, J .
DIABETES CARE, 1990, 13 (08) :898-900
[5]  
HARDING P E, 1973, Clinical Endocrinology, V2, P387, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2265.1973.tb01725.x
[6]   PREVALENCE OF DIABETES AND IMPAIRED GLUCOSE-TOLERANCE AND PLASMA-GLUCOSE LEVELS IN UNITED-STATES POPULATION AGED 20-74 YR [J].
HARRIS, MI ;
HADDEN, WC ;
KNOWLER, WC ;
BENNETT, PH .
DIABETES, 1987, 36 (04) :523-534
[7]   THE OGTT - GOLD THAT DOES NOT SHINE [J].
HOME, P .
DIABETIC MEDICINE, 1988, 5 (04) :313-314
[8]  
JARRETT RJ, 1976, LANCET, V2, P1009
[9]   FRUCTOSAMINE MEASUREMENTS IN SERUM AND PLASMA [J].
MACDONALD, D ;
PANG, CP ;
COCKRAM, CS ;
SWAMINATHAN, R .
CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 1987, 168 (02) :247-252
[10]   IMPRECISION OF NEW CRITERIA FOR THE ORAL GLUCOSE-TOLERANCE TEST [J].
MASSARI, V ;
ESCHWEGE, E ;
VALLERON, AJ .
DIABETOLOGIA, 1983, 24 (02) :100-106