PROTECTION OF THE INTERNAL MAMMARY ARTERY PEDICLE WITH POLYTETRAFLUOROETHYLENE MEMBRANE

被引:19
作者
ZEHR, KJ [1 ]
LEE, PC [1 ]
POSTON, RS [1 ]
GILLINOV, AM [1 ]
HRUBAN, RH [1 ]
CAMERON, DE [1 ]
机构
[1] JOHNS HOPKINS MED INST,DIV CARDIAC SURG,BALTIMORE,MD 21205
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1540-8191.1993.tb00425.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
With increasing frequency, reoperative coronary artery bypass surgery is being performed in the setting of a patent internal mammary artery (IMA) graft. Injury to the IMA graft at reoperation can result in ischemic myocardial injury and cardiac arrest. This descriptive laboratory study examined use of a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membrane wrap to protect the IMA pedicle during sternal reentry. Six pigs (25-30 kg) underwent median sternotomy and takedown of left and right IMAs. Grafts were implanted in the epicardium by a modified Vineberg procedure. In each animal, one IMA was wrapped circumferentially with PTFE, while the contralateral bare IMA served as the control. Redo sternotomy was performed 3 months later. Severe adhesions between chest wall, myocardium, and bare IMA grafts were encountered in six of six animals. PTFE-wrapped IMAs were easily identified by appearance and by palpation. There was no adherence between PTFE membranes and surrounding tissue, nor was there evidence of cellular infiltration, disruption, or contraction of the membrane. Most notably, PTFE membranes could not be cut or injured with the electrocautery, since they are electrical nonconductors. This study demonstrates that PTFE membrane: (1) is relatively inert and incites minimal surrounding tissue reaction; and (2) is impenetrable to electrocautery injury. Further studies are necessary to determine the impact of PTFE membrane on IMA graft patency and wound infection. PTFE membrane may prove clinically useful in protecting patent IMA pedicles during reoperative cardiac surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:650 / 655
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Lytle BW, Loop FD, Cosgrove DM, Et al., Long‐term (5 to 12 years) serial studies of internal mammary artery and saphenous vein coronary bypass grafts, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 89, pp. 248-258, (1985)
[2]  
Loop FD, Lytle BW, Gill CC, Et al., Trends in selection and results of coronary artery reoperations, Ann Thorac Surg, 36, pp. 380-388, (1983)
[3]  
Berry BE, Davis DJ, Sheely CH, Et al., Protection and expanded use of the left internal mammary artery graft by pericardial flap technique, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 95, pp. 346-347, (1988)
[4]  
Gonzalez-Santos JM, Bastida E, Vallejo JL, Et al., Selective and adjustable pericardial flap to protect internal mammary artery grafts, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 50, pp. 995-997, (1990)
[5]  
Minale C, Nikol S, Hollweg G, Et al., Clinical experience with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene Gore‐Tex<sup>R</sup> surgical membrane for pericardial closure: A study of 110 cases, J Card Surg, 3, pp. 193-201, (1988)
[6]  
Harada Y, Imai Y, Kurosawa H, Et al., Long‐term results of the clinical use of an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene surgical membrane as a pericardial substitute, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 96, pp. 811-815, (1988)
[7]  
Amato JJ, Cotroneo JV, Galdieri RJ, Et al., Experience with the polytetrafluoroethylene surgical membrane for pericardial closure in operations for congenital cardiac defects, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 97, pp. 929-934, (1989)
[8]  
Revuelta JM, Garcia-Rinaldi R, Val F, Et al., Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene surgical membrane for pericardial closure. An experimental study, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 89, pp. 451-455, (1985)
[9]  
Schaff HV, Orszulak TA, Gersh BJ, Et al., The morbidity and mortality of reoperation for coronary artery disease and analysis of late results with use of actuarial estimate of event‐free survival, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 85, pp. 508-515, (1983)
[10]  
Kohanna FH, Adams PX, Cunningham JN, Et al., Use of autologous fascia lata as pericardial substitute following open‐heart surgery, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 74, pp. 14-19, (1977)