Factors affecting streamwater chemistry in the Great Smoky Mountains, USA

被引:23
作者
Flum, T
Nodvin, SC
机构
[1] UNIV TENNESSEE,NATL BIOL SERV,KNOXVILLE,TN 37996
[2] UNIV TENNESSEE,GRAD FAC ECOL & EVOLUT BIOL,KNOXVILLE,TN 37996
关键词
Great Smoky Mountains; water chemistry; stream; atmospheric deposition; nitrogen saturation;
D O I
10.1007/BF00477226
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Great Smoky Mountains in the southeastern U.S. receive high total atmospheric deposition of sulphur and nitrogen (N) and contain large areas of shallow, poorly buffered soils. Results from extensive surveys conducted in October 1993 and March 1994 showed that stream pH values were near or below 5.5 and Acid Neutralizing Capacity (ANC) was below 50 mu eqL(-1) at high elevations. Mechanisms of acidification varies among stream systems in the study. We classified each study catchment into one of five water quality districts based upon within-basin elevational gradients of streamwater quality. Geologic factors, cf. the presence of calcareous or pyritic bedrock types exhibited a major influence on water quality and within-basin elevational gradients. Atmospheric deposition is an important factor affecting water quality at high elevations in all districts. Nitrate was the dominant strong acid anion in streamwater in many catchments, particularly at high elevation and especially in basins draining old growth forests. Most high elevation catchments appear to be N saturated. Continued high atmospheric loadings of N will likely spread N saturation of catchments downslope into areas where second growth forests are now maturing. Stream sulphate concentrations were lower than expected at higher elevations and may be related to the N saturation status of these systems.
引用
收藏
页码:1707 / 1712
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   NITROGEN SATURATION IN NORTHERN FOREST ECOSYSTEMS [J].
ABER, JD ;
NADELHOFFER, KJ ;
STEUDLER, P ;
MELILLO, JM .
BIOSCIENCE, 1989, 39 (06) :378-386
[2]  
Eilers JM, 1991, ACIDIC DEPOSITION AQ, P107
[3]  
ELWOOD JW, 1991, ACIDIC DEPOSITION AQ, P291
[4]   SULFATE ADSORPTION AND DESORPTION REVERSIBILITY IN A VARIETY OF FOREST SOILS [J].
HARRISON, RB ;
JOHNSON, DW ;
TODD, DE .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 1989, 18 (04) :419-426
[5]  
Johnson D. W, 1992, ATMOSPHERIC DEPOSITI
[6]  
KING P, 1968, 587 USGS
[7]   DEPOSITION AND FOREST CANOPY INTERACTIONS OF AIRBORNE SULFUR - RESULTS FROM THE INTEGRATED FOREST STUDY [J].
LINDBERG, SE ;
LOVETT, GM .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT PART A-GENERAL TOPICS, 1992, 26 (08) :1477-1492
[8]  
MCMASTER WM, 1970, HA420 USGS
[9]   THE EFFECT OF PH ON SULFATE ADSORPTION BY A FOREST SOIL [J].
NODVIN, SC ;
DRISCOLL, CT ;
LIKENS, GE .
SOIL SCIENCE, 1986, 142 (02) :69-75
[10]   SOIL PROCESSES AND SULFATE LOSS AT THE HUBBARD-BROOK EXPERIMENTAL FOREST [J].
NODVIN, SC ;
DRISCOLL, CT ;
LIKENS, GE .
BIOGEOCHEMISTRY, 1988, 5 (02) :185-199