CAN BIRD ATLAS DATA BE USED TO ESTIMATE POPULATION-SIZE - A CASE-STUDY USING NAMIBIAN ENDEMICS

被引:66
作者
ROBERTSON, A
SIMMONS, RE
JARVIS, AM
BROWN, CJ
机构
[1] UNIV EDINBURGH,INST ECOL & RESOURCE MANAGEMENT,EDINBURGH EH9 3JU,MIDLOTHIAN,SCOTLAND
[2] MINIST WILDLIFE CONSERVAT & TOURISM,ORNITHOL SECT,WINDHOEK,NAMIBIA
[3] MINIST WILDLIFE CONSERVAT & TOURISM,DIRECTORATE ENVIRONM AFFAIRS,WINDHOEK,NAMIBIA
[4] BELMONT,DALKEITH EH22 3BH,MIDLOTHIAN,SCOTLAND
关键词
BIRD ATLAS DATA; NAMIBIA; ENDEMIC BIRDS; REPORTING RATE; POPULATION STATUS;
D O I
10.1016/0006-3207(94)00024-K
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
An assessment of population size is a fundamental stage in the conservation of any species. The recent availability of data from the Southern African Bird Atlas Project (SABAP) provides a tool to investigate the status and distribution of approximately 900 bird species covered by this work. It is often assumed, but rarely shown, that bird atlas reporting rates provide a measure of relative abundance. Here, we go one step further to assess whether or not reporting rate can be used to establish absolute abundance and thereby produce estimates of population size. To do so, one must establish consistent relationships between reporting rates and bird densities from samples throughout the species' range, and then extrapolate those densities to all areas where the species occurs. Field transects were undertaken in the austral winter of 1993, across the distributions of most near-endemic birds in north-western Namibia. Density values obtained from the main riverine and upland zones inhabited by these species were used in combination with a Geographic Information System (GIS) and overlays of three spatial layers (vegetation, altitude and rainfall) to produce bird estimates for each sampled square. The relationship between reporting rate and abundance was investigated using log-linear regression for four species differing in size and habitat specialisation. We found significant relationships (p < 0.005) for three of the four species and results marginally significant (p = 0.051) for the fourth, most cryptic, species. We conclude that reporting rates can be used to give reasonable estimates of abundance for some species, but careful consideration must be given to factors such as field sampling effort, detail of GIS overlays and particularly the quality of the original atlas data.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 95
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
BURNHAM KP, 1981, STUD AVIAN BIOL, V6, P466
[2]  
CLINNING C F, 1972, Madoqua, V1, P57
[3]  
Cochran W.G, 1957, STAT METHODS, V6th ed
[4]  
du Plessis G.J., 1989, Mirafra, V6, P114
[5]  
GIBBON G, 1991, SO AFRICAN BIRD SOUN
[6]  
Gibbons D. W., 1993, NEW ATLAS BREEDING B
[7]  
HARRISON JA, 1992, S AFR J SCI, V88, P410
[8]  
HARRISON JA, 1989, BIOTIC DIVERSITY SO
[9]  
HARRISON JA, IN PRESS ATLAS SO AF
[10]  
Hockey PAR, 1989, ATLAS BIRDS S W CAPE