DETERMINING THE CLASSICS IN SOCIAL CHOICE

被引:3
作者
DURDEN, G
机构
[1] Department of Economics, Appalachian State University, Boone, 28608, NC
关键词
D O I
10.1007/BF00123864
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Determination of classic papers and books in any field is of interest and importance to scholars and others interested in the subject areas. Since social/public choice is such a rapidly growing field of increasing importance it seems particularly relevant that we pay tribute to the founders. One means of doing this is to analyze citations to their most important works. This process allows us to simultaneously observe the depth and breadth to which the seminal ideas in the sub-discipline have penetrated the world of social science scholarship. My methodology produces somewhat different results than those reported in the 1981 Public Choice paper by Downing and Stafford. This is not to say that their method is inferior, but that different methods produce differing results which provide readers with a wider range of information about important works in social choice. © 1991 Kluwer Academic Publishers.
引用
收藏
页码:265 / 277
页数:13
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Arrow K.J, 1951, SOCIAL CHOICE INDIVI
[2]  
Black Duncan, 1958, THEORY COMMITTEES EL
[3]  
Buchanan J. M., 1962, CALCULUS CONSENT
[4]  
BUCHANAN JM, 1988, PUBLIC CHOICE, V59, P291
[5]   THE PROBLEM OF SOCIAL COST [J].
COASE, RH .
JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 1960, 3 (OCT) :1-44
[6]   CITATIONS AS AN INDICATOR OF CLASSIC WORKS AND MAJOR CONTRIBUTORS IN SOCIAL CHOICE [J].
DOWNING, PB ;
STAFFORD, EA .
PUBLIC CHOICE, 1981, 37 (02) :219-230
[7]  
Downs A., 1967, INSIDE BUREAUCRACY
[8]  
Downs A., 1957, EC THEORY DEMOCRACY
[9]  
DURDEN G, 1989, IN PRESS PUBLIC CHOI
[10]  
Farquharson R., 1969, THEORY OF VOTING