COMPLEX INTERACTIONS IN METACOMMUNITIES, WITH IMPLICATIONS FOR BIODIVERSITY AND HIGHER LEVELS OF SELECTION

被引:387
作者
WILSON, DS
机构
关键词
BIODIVERSITY; CHAOS; COMMUNITY SELECTION; COMPLEX INTERACTIONS; GROUP SELECTION; METACOMMUNITY; METAPOPULATION; POPULATION STRUCTURE; SENSITIVE DEPENDENCE; SPATIAL HETEROGENEITY; SPECIES DIVERSITY; SUPERORGANISMS;
D O I
10.2307/1941449
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Two common features of biological communities are (a) complex interactions among species, which make community dynamics sensitive to initial conditions, and (b) spatial heterogeneity, which fragments large-scale ecological systems into a mosaic of patches, hereafter termed a "metacommunity." This computer simulation study examines the effect of complex interactions on the global and local dynamics of metacommunities. Patches are physically identical and differ only in the initial proportion of species that colonize the patches. The random variation is then magnified by deterministic interactions that cause patches to follow different trajectories based on initial conditions. After a period of interaction, individuals from all patches join a global pool of dispersers that colonize a new "generation" of patches. Complex interactions can have at least two important effects on metacommunity dynamics. First, the number of species coexisting in the metacommunity can greatly exceed the number of species coexisting in any single patch, despite the fact that the patches are physically identical, the species do not differ in colonization ability, and stochastic effects are absent after the colonization stage. Second, complex interactions provide a new source of variation upon which natural selection can operate at the patch level, providing a mechanism for the evolution of functionally organized communities.
引用
收藏
页码:1984 / 2000
页数:17
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   ARE ECOLOGICAL-SYSTEMS CHAOTIC - AND IF NOT, WHY NOT [J].
BERRYMAN, AA ;
MILLSTEIN, JA .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 1989, 4 (01) :26-28
[2]   GROUP SELECTION AMONG ALTERNATIVE EVOLUTIONARILY STABLE STRATEGIES [J].
BOYD, R ;
RICHERSON, PJ .
JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 1990, 145 (03) :331-342
[3]  
CHESSON PL, 1988, ANN ZOOL FENN, V25, P5
[4]  
Chesson PL, 1983, POPULATION BIOL, P188, DOI [10.1007/978-3-642-87893-0, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-87893-0_25]
[5]  
Clements F. E., 1939, BIOECOLOGY
[6]   COMMUNITY-ASSEMBLY MECHANICS AND THE STRUCTURE OF AN EXPERIMENTAL SPECIES ENSEMBLE [J].
DRAKE, JA .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1991, 137 (01) :1-26
[7]   THE MECHANICS OF COMMUNITY ASSEMBLY AND SUCCESSION [J].
DRAKE, JA .
JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 1990, 147 (02) :213-233
[8]   COMMUNITIES AS ASSEMBLED STRUCTURES - DO RULES GOVERN PATTERN [J].
DRAKE, JA .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 1990, 5 (05) :159-164
[9]  
DRAKE JA, 1992, IN PRESS J ANIMAL EC