Segmenting stakeholders in terms of Corporate Responsibility: Implications for Reputation Management

被引:19
作者
Hillenbrand, Carola [1 ]
Money, Kevin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Reading, Henley Business Sch, POB 218, Reading RG6 6AA, Berks, England
来源
AUSTRALASIAN MARKETING JOURNAL | 2009年 / 17卷 / 02期
关键词
Corporate Responsibility; Reputation Management; Stakeholder segmentation; Latent class analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.ausmj.2009.05.004
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Corporate Responsibility is a concept that is receiving increasing attention in the Corporate Reputation literature. Many researchers have sought to link high levels of Corporate Responsibility with good Corporate Reputations. Yet, the link between these two concepts is not clear and managers do not have much guidance on how they could embrace Corporate Responsibility to enhance Corporate Reputation. One potential reason for the current confusion is that stakeholders have, for the most part, been considered as being homogenous in terms of their expectations of Corporate Responsibility, which means reputational impact is difficult to define. This paper challenges the notion that Corporate Responsibility is an homogenous construct. A latent class model is used to provide evidence that customers and employees of a financial service organisation can be segmented into three groups. This suggests that these groups have different expectations of Corporate Responsibility and as such positive reputation is likely to be driven by meeting these different sets of expectations. The understanding of how Corporate Responsibility impacts on Corporate Reputation is heightened and further implications for the management of reputation and directions for future research are discussed. (C) 2009 Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 105
页数:7
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
Ahmad S. J., 2003, International Journal of Business Performance Management, V5, P141, DOI 10.1504/IJBPM.2003.003260
[2]  
Andriof J., 2017, UNFOLDING STAKEHOLDE
[3]  
Balmer J. M., 1998, J MARKET MANAG, V14, P963, DOI DOI 10.1362/026725798784867536
[4]  
Baruch Y, 1999, HUM RELAT, V52, P421, DOI 10.1177/001872679905200401
[5]  
Brammer S., 2005, J CORP CITIZENSH, V20, P39, DOI 10.9774/GLEAF.4700.2005.wi.00007
[6]   Corporate reputation and social performance: The importance of fit [J].
Brammer, SJ ;
Pavelin, S .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2006, 43 (03) :435-455
[7]  
Bromley D., 2002, CORPORATE REPUTATION, V5, P35, DOI DOI 10.1057/PALGRAVE.CRR.1540163
[8]   Identity, intended image, construed image, and reputation: An interdisciplinary framework and suggested terminology [J].
Brown, TJ ;
Dacin, PA ;
Pratt, MG ;
Whetten, DA .
JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF MARKETING SCIENCE, 2006, 34 (02) :99-106
[9]   The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses [J].
Brown, TJ ;
Dacin, PA .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1997, 61 (01) :68-84
[10]  
Carroll A.B., 1979, ACAD MANAGE REV, V4, P497, DOI [DOI 10.2307/257850, https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1979.4498296, DOI 10.5465/AMR.1979.4498296, 10.5465/amr.1979.4498296]