INTERNATIONAL PRIMARY CARE CLASSIFICATIONS - THE EFFECT OF 15 YEARS OF EVOLUTION

被引:84
作者
LAMBERTS, H
WOOD, M
HOFMANSOKKES, IM
机构
[1] Department of General Practice, University of Amsterdam
[2] Department of Family Practice, Medical College ofVirginia
关键词
D O I
10.1093/fampra/9.3.330
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
To better understand the development of primary care classifications over the past 15 years, 10 primary care databases have been retrospectively analysed using the structure of the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC) as the basis. All datasets were based on routine data collection using different classification systems by several family physicians during all encounters with their patients over considerable periods of time, in most cases one year. The prevalences or the rates of the available diagnostic-and reason for encounter-classes were distributed over four frequencies. With a few exceptions the distribution of diagnostic labels referring to common diseases is surprisingly similar. The use of ICPC however results in a quantum leap in the use of symptom and complaint diagnoses. Because of this shift primary care physicians now have available a classification with 400 diagnostic classes used with a prevalence of greater-than-or-equal-to 1/1000 patient-years or per 1000 visiting patients per year. The classification of reasons for encounter allows the physician to identify over 300 reasons for encounter used greater-than-or-equal-to 1/1000 patient years or per 1000 visiting patients per year. Family physicians have been successful in the development of new primary care classifications. Rag bag rubrics which are the result of the structure of ICPC are used relatively often and deserve more attention from primary care taxonomers.
引用
收藏
页码:330 / 339
页数:10
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
The core content of family medicine, Trans: Congr. of Delegates of the a AGP, (1966)
[2]  
Marsland D., Wood M., Mayo F., Content of family practice. A statewide study in Virginia with its clinical, educational and research implications, J Fam Pract, 3, (1976)
[3]  
Hoyos M.D., Yeo J.E., Renwick S., Morbidity in general practice in Barbados, West Indian Med J, 29, (1980)
[4]  
Morbidity Figures from General Practice, (1985)
[5]  
Bridges-Webb C., The Australian morbidity and prescribing survey, 1969-1974, Med J Aust, 2, (1976)
[6]  
Lamberts H., Morbidity in General Practice, (1984)
[7]  
Morbidity Statistics from General Practice 1981-1982, (1986)
[8]  
Lamberts H., Brouwer H., Groen A., Huisman H., Het transitiemodel in de huisartspraktijk, Huisarts Wet, 30, (1987)
[9]  
National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, 1977-78, pp. 82-1717, (1982)
[10]  
Lamberts H., Meads S., Wood M., Results of the international field trial with the reason for encounter classification, Sozial Prdventivmed, 30, (1985)