Systemic Therapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Patterns of Chemotherapy and Biologic Therapy Use in US Medical Oncology Practice

被引:68
作者
Hess, Gregory P. [1 ]
Wang, Peter Feng
Quach, David
Barber, Beth
Zhao, Zhongyun
机构
[1] SDI Hlth, 220 W Germantown Pike, Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JOP.2010.000072
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: With the emergence of new chemotherapies and biologic agents in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), the optimal combination and sequencing of these therapies are yet to be determined. This study examined the extent and pattern of chemotherapy and biologic therapy use by line of treatment. Biologic continuation and dose escalation were also examined. Methods: This study used an integrated electronic medical record database of 91 US oncology practices. Records were analyzed for 1,655 adult patients with mCRC who were treated from January 1, 2004 to January 31, 2008 with systemic therapy and could be observed for >= 3 months beyond their diagnosis of metastatic disease. Combination and sequence of individual drugs and regimens were examined. Results: For first-line therapy, the most common chemotherapy backbone was infused fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX; 40.5% of patients), and the most common treatment regimen was FOLFOX plus bevacizumab (26.2%). For second-line therapy, fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) was the most common chemotherapy backbone (25.7%), and FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab was the most common treatment regimen (18.3%). Across the study period, 68.6%, 22%, and 7% of patients received bevacizumab, cetuximab, and panitumumab, respectively. Among 412 patients receiving bevacizumab-containing regimens as first-line therapy who then received second-line therapy, 58% continued receiving bevacizumab, with dose escalation observed in 44%. Conclusion: The most commonly used chemotherapy backbones for mCRC treatment were first-line FOLFOX and second-line FOLFIRI. Bevacizumab was the most frequently administered biologic therapy. Continuation and dose escalation with bevacizumab were frequently observed across lines of therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:301 / +
页数:9
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Metastatic colorectal cancer - Current systemic treatment options
    Board, Ruth E.
    Valle, Juan W.
    [J]. DRUGS, 2007, 67 (13) : 1851 - 1867
  • [2] Clark J.W., SYSTEMIC CHEMOTHERAP
  • [3] Receipt of Guideline-recommended Follow-up in Older Colorectal Cancer Survivors A Population-based Analysis
    Cooper, Gregory S.
    Kou, Tzuyung Doug
    Reynolds, Harry L., Jr.
    [J]. CANCER, 2008, 113 (08) : 2029 - 2037
  • [4] Optimal approach to potentially resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer
    Falcone, Alfredo
    Fornaro, Lorenzo
    Loupakis, Fotios
    Masi, Gianluca
    Vasile, Enrico
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2008, 8 (10) : 1533 - 1539
  • [5] The continuum of care: A paradigm for the management of metastatic colorectal cancer
    Goldberg, Richard M.
    Rothenberg, Mace L.
    Van Cutsem, Eric
    Benson, Al B., III
    Blanke, Charles D.
    Diasio, Robert B.
    Grothey, Axel
    Lenz, Heinz-Josef
    Meropol, Neal J.
    Ramanathan, Ramesh K.
    Becerra, Carlos H. Roberto
    Wickham, Rita
    Armstrong, Delma
    Viele, Carol
    [J]. ONCOLOGIST, 2007, 12 (01) : 38 - 50
  • [6] Therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer
    Goldberg, Richard M.
    [J]. ONCOLOGIST, 2006, 11 (09) : 981 - 987
  • [7] Greene FL, 2002, AJCC CANC STAGING MA, P113
  • [8] Bevacizumab Beyond First Progression Is Associated With Prolonged Overall Survival in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Results From a Large Observational Cohort Study (BRiTE)
    Grothey, Axel
    Sugrue, Mary M.
    Purdie, David M.
    Dong, Wei
    Sargent, Daniel
    Hedrick, Eric
    Kozloff, Mark
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (33) : 5326 - 5334
  • [9] Gruenberger T, 2004, EUR SURG, V36, P317
  • [10] Systemic therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: Current options, current evidence
    Kelly, H
    Goldberg, RM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (20) : 4553 - 4560