COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY AND MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING IN THE PREOPERATIVE WORK-UP FOR COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION

被引:24
作者
KLEIN, HM
BOHNDORF, K
HERMES, H
SCHUTZ, WF
GUNTHER, RW
SCHLONDORFF, G
机构
[1] Department of Radiology, Technical University Aachen, Aachen
[2] Department of Otolaryngology, Technical University Aachen, Aachen
关键词
COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE; TECHNOLOGY; EAR; CT; MRI; COCHLEAR IMPLANT;
D O I
10.1016/0720-048X(92)90212-R
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The role of CT and MRI in the evaluation of patients for possible insertion of a multichannel intracochlear hearing device was appraised. The study included 52 patients who underwent both CT and MRI examinations, 40 of whom were later operated on. Coronal and axial T2-weighted spin-echo sequences were performed in 25 volunteers with normal hearing and in 47 adult patients. In 5 patients, instead of a T2-weighted spin-echo sequence, a T2*-weighted gradient echo 3D sequence with axial presaturation was used. In 39 patients with normal appearances on CT and MRI, the implant device was successfully inserted. One patient who underwent surgery had a reduced cochlear signal on MRI but a normal CT scan; however, at surgery, the implant device could only be inserted into the first turn of the cochlea, due to fibrous obliteration. In 3 of 12 patients who were not operated upon, the results of diagnostic imaging indicated that the insertion of an intracochlear hearing device was not useful. Our experience indicates that, with reduced cochlear fluid signal intensities on MRI, fibrous obliteration of the cochlear turns is likely to be present. MRI proved to be a useful adjunct to CT, but the latter was necessary for the evaluation of bony abnormalities. Gradient echo sequences can successfully replace time-consuming T2-weighted spin-echo sequences.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 92
页数:4
相关论文
共 7 条
[1]  
Mueller, Dolan, Gantz, Temporal bone computed tomography in the preoperative evaluation for cochlear implantation, Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 98, pp. 346-349, (1989)
[2]  
Swartz, High-resolution computed tomography of the middle ear and mastoid, Radiology, 148, pp. 449-454, (1983)
[3]  
Virapongse, Rothman, Kier, Sarwar, Computed tomographic anatomy of the temporal bone, American Journal of Roentgenology, 139, pp. 739-749, (1982)
[4]  
Rosenberg, Cohen, Reede, Radiographic imaging for the cochlear implant, Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 96, pp. 300-304, (1987)
[5]  
Jackler, Luxford, Schindler, McKerrow, Cochlear patency problems in cochlear implantation, Laryngoscope, 97, pp. 801-805, (1987)
[6]  
Harnsberger, Dart, Parkin, Smoker, Osborn, Cochlear implant candidates: assessment with CT and MR imaging, Radiology, 164, pp. 53-57, (1987)
[7]  
Laszig, Terwey, Battmer, Hesse, Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and high resolution computed tomography (HRCT) in intracochlear implant candidates, Scand Audiol Suppl, 30, pp. 197-200, (1988)