OPEN PELVIC LYMPH-NODE DISSECTION FOR PROSTATE-CANCER - A REASSESSMENT

被引:68
作者
CAMPBELL, SC
KLEIN, EA
LEVIN, HS
PIEDMONTE, MR
机构
[1] CLEVELAND CLIN FDN,DEPT UROL,CLEVELAND,OH 44195
[2] CLEVELAND CLIN FDN,DEPT PATHOL,CLEVELAND,OH 44195
[3] CLEVELAND CLIN FDN,DEPT BIOSTAT & EPIDEMIOL,CLEVELAND,OH 44195
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80219-2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives. To provide a risk-to-benefit analysis of open staging pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) for prostate cancer. Methods. The medical records of all patients presenting with prostate cancer from July 1989 to April 1994 were reviewed. A total of 245 patients with clinically localized disease were selected to undergo radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) preceded by open PLND. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the predictive value of the preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration, clinical stage, and Gleason score with regard to final nodal status. The cost and morbidity associated with PLND in the setting of RRP was also defined. Results. Overall, only 16 patients (6.5%) had lymph node metastases. Lymph node involvement correlated significantly with elevated serum PSA values (P = 0.0001), high Gleason score (P = 0.0022), and advanced clinical stage (P = 0.0001). Lymph node metastases were particularly uncommon in patients with nonpalpable tumors (1 of 67 [1.5%]), PSA values less than 10 (2 of 154 [1.3%]), and Gleason score less than 6 (1 of 26 [3.8%]). Overall, 179 patients (73.1%) presented with at least one or more of these favorable characteristics, and only 4 (2.2%) had lymph node involvement. Complications related to the lymphadenectomy oc curred in 10 patients (4.1%). The cost per metastasis diagnosed in patients with low-risk characteristics was approximately $43,600. Conclusions. An open staging PLND may no longer be justified on a routine basis in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy.
引用
收藏
页码:352 / 355
页数:4
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   ELIMINATING THE NEED FOR BILATERAL PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY IN SELECT PATIENTS WITH PROSTATE-CANCER [J].
BLUESTEIN, DL ;
BOSTWICK, DG ;
BERGSTRALH, EJ ;
OESTERLING, JE .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1994, 151 (05) :1315-1320
[2]   STAGING PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY FOR CARCINOMA OF THE PROSTATE - RISK VERSUS BENEFIT [J].
BRENDLER, CB ;
CLEEVE, LK ;
ANDERSON, EE ;
PAULSON, DF .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1980, 124 (06) :849-850
[3]  
CATALONA WJ, 1981, J UROLOGY, V127, P460
[4]   THE CONTEMPORARY INCIDENCE OF LYMPH-NODE METASTASES IN PROSTATE-CANCER - IMPLICATIONS FOR LAPAROSCOPIC LYMPH-NODE DISSECTION [J].
DANELLA, JF ;
DEKERNION, JB ;
SMITH, RB ;
STECKEL, J .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1993, 149 (06) :1488-1491
[5]   INTRAOPERATIVE AND EARLY COMPLICATIONS OF STAGING PELVIC LYMPH-NODE DISSECTION IN PROSTATIC ADENOCARCINOMA [J].
DONOHUE, RE ;
MANI, JH ;
WHITESEL, JA ;
AUGSPURGER, RR ;
WILLIAMS, G ;
FAUVER, HE .
UROLOGY, 1990, 35 (03) :223-227
[6]   FROZEN SECTION DETECTION OF LYMPH-NODE METASTASES IN PROSTATIC-CARCINOMA - ACCURACY IN GROSSLY UNINVOLVED PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY SPECIMENS [J].
EPSTEIN, JI ;
OESTERLING, JE ;
EGGLESTON, JC ;
WALSH, PC .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1986, 136 (06) :1234-1237
[7]   PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE OF LYMPH NODAL METASTASES IN PROSTATE-CANCER [J].
GERVASI, LA ;
MATA, J ;
EASLEY, JD ;
WILBANKS, JH ;
SEALEHAWKINS, C ;
CARLTON, CE ;
SCARDINO, PT .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1989, 142 (02) :332-336
[8]  
HERMANCK P, 1987, TNM CLASSIFICATION M, P145
[9]   PERIOPERATIVE AND POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS FROM BILATERAL PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY AND RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY [J].
IGEL, TC ;
BARRETT, DM ;
SEGURA, JW ;
BENSON, RC ;
RIFE, CC .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1987, 137 (06) :1189-1191
[10]  
KAVOUSSI LR, 1993, J UROLOGY, V149, P322, DOI 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)36069-X