COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT DOSES OF EPINEPHRINE ON MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION AND RESUSCITATION SUCCESS DURING CARDIOPULMONARY-RESUSCITATION IN A PIG MODEL

被引:89
作者
LINDNER, KH
AHNEFELD, FW
BOWDLER, IM
机构
[1] Universitätsklinik für Anästhesiologie, Klinikum der Universität Ulm, Ulm
关键词
CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION; EPINEPHRINE DOSAGE; CORONARY PERFUSION PRESSURE; MYOCARDIAL BLOOD FLOW;
D O I
10.1016/0735-6757(91)90008-8
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Published results of dose-response effects of adrenergic drugs (epinephrine [E]) vary so much between studies because of differences in animal models and duration of ischemia before drug administration. In this investigation the effects of different doses of E on coronary perfusion pressure (CPP), left ventricular myocardial blood flow (MBF) and resuscitation success were compared during closed-chest cardiopulmonary rest scitation (CRP) after a 4-minute period of ventricular fibrillation in 28 pigs. MBF was measured during normal sinus rhythm using tracer microspheres. After 4 minutes of ventricular fibrillation CPR was performed with the use of a pneumatic piston compressor. After 4 minutes of mechanical measures only, the animals were randomly allocated into four groups of seven, receiving 0.015, 0.030, 0.045, and 0.090 mg/kg E intravenously respectively. MBF measurements were started 45 seconds after E administration; hemodynamic measurements after 90 seconds. Four minutes after the first administration, the same E dose was given before defibrillation. The CPP of animals given 0.015, 0.030, 0.045 and 0.090 mg/kg E were as follows: 16.3 ± 6.1, 25.6 ± 5.8, 33.2 ± 8.4 and 30.4 ± 6.3 mm Hg. The left ventricular MBF values were: 14 ± 9, 27 ± 11, 43 ± 6, 46 ± 10 mL/min/100 g. The differences between the groups receiving 0.015 and 0.045 mg/kg and between the groups receiving 0.015 mg/kg and 0.090 mg/kg were statistically significant (P < .05). Resuscitation success was 14.3%, 42.9%, 100% and 86.7% respectively. A significant difference in resuscitation success was found only betwen 0.015 mg/kg and 0.045 mg/kg E. Our results suggest that after a 4-minute period of arrest and 4 minutes of CPR, CPP, MBF and resuscitation success are increased when E is given at a dosage of up to 0.045 mg/kg; however, the increase to 0.090 mg/kg does not lead to any further improvement. © 1991.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 31
页数:5
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
Standards and guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and emergency cardiac care (ECC), JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 255, pp. 2905-2989, (1986)
[2]  
Pearson, Redding, Influence of peripheral vascular tone on cardiac resuscitation, Anesth Analg, 44, pp. 746-752, (1965)
[3]  
Michael, Guerci, Koehler, Et al., Mechanism by which epinephrine augments cerebral and myocardial perfusion during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in dogs, Circulation, 69, pp. 822-835, (1984)
[4]  
Heymann, Payne, Hoffmann, Et al., Blood flow measurements with radionuclide-labeled particles, Prog Cardiovasc Dis, 20, pp. 55-79, (1977)
[5]  
Sanders, Ewy, Taft, Prognostic and therapeutic importance of the aortic diastolic pressure in resuscitation from cardiac arrest, Crit Care Med, 12, pp. 871-873, (1984)
[6]  
Linder, Ahnefeld, Bowdler, Cardiopulmonary resuscitation with interposed abdominal compression after asphyxial or fibrillatory cardiac arrest in pigs, Anesthesiology, 72, pp. 675-680, (1990)
[7]  
Niemann, Differences in cerebral and myocardial perfusion during closed-chest resuscitation, Ann Emerg Med, 13, pp. 849-853, (1984)
[8]  
Kosnik, Jackson, Keats, Et al., Dose-related response of centrally administered epinephrine on the change in aortic diastolic pressure during closed-chest massage in dogs, Ann Emerg Med, 14, pp. 204-208, (1985)
[9]  
Brown, Taylor, Werman, Et al., Myocardial oxygen delivery and consumption during CPR A comparison of epinephrine and phenylephrine, Annals of Emergency Medicine, 17, pp. 302-308, (1988)
[10]  
Ralston, Tacker, Showen, Et al., Endotracheal versus intravenous epinephrine during electromechanical dissociation with CPR in dogs, Annals of Emergency Medicine, pp. 1044-1048, (1985)