SAME DIFFERENT JUDGMENTS OF MULTILETTER STRINGS - INSENSITIVITY TO POSITIONAL BIAS AND SPACING

被引:8
作者
PROCTOR, RW [1 ]
HEALY, AF [1 ]
VANZANDT, T [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV COLORADO,BOULDER,CO 80309
来源
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS | 1991年 / 49卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.3758/BF03211617
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Several recent studies of multiletter matching have included pairs of strings that have the same letters in different positions (rearranged pairs). The task can be defined such that these rearranged pairs are correctly classified as different (i.e., subjects respond "same" only if the strings have the same letters in the same positions--the order task) or as same (i.e., subjects respond "same" if the strings have the same letters regardless of their positions--the item task). The order task produces left-to-right serial-position effects, whereas the item task produces U-shaped serial-position effects. Because these differences suggest that subjects may be able to exert strategic control over the comparison process, two sets of experiments were designed to test whether or not subjects can change the relative weightings devoted to the respective serial positions. In Experiments 1 and 2, the probability that a mismatch occurred in the different positions was manipulated. In Experiments 3 and 4, the physical spacing between letters, as well as whether or not the spaces were filled with neutral noise characters, was varied. None of the manipulations had much influence on the serial-position effects. Thus, the distinct serial-position effects for the order and item tasks apparently are mandatory and not due to any voluntary comparison strategy.
引用
收藏
页码:62 / 72
页数:11
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   FAMILIARITY EFFECT FOR SINGLE-LETTER PAIRS [J].
AMBLER, BA ;
PROCTOR, JD .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1976, 2 (02) :222-234
[2]   ORDER INFORMATION IN MULTIPLE-ELEMENT COMPARISON [J].
ANGIOLILLOBENT, JS ;
RIPS, LJ .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1982, 8 (03) :392-406
[3]   ORTHOGRAPHY AND FAMILIARITY EFFECTS IN WORD PROCESSING [J].
CARR, TH ;
POLLATSEK, A ;
POSNER, MI ;
SNYDER, CRR .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1979, 108 (04) :389-414
[4]   RESPONSE COMPETITION EFFECTS IN SAME-DIFFERENT JUDGMENTS [J].
ERIKSEN, CW ;
OHARA, WP ;
ERIKSEN, B .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1982, 32 (03) :261-270
[5]   TARGET REDUNDANCY IN VISUAL-SEARCH - DO REPETITIONS OF THE TARGET WITHIN THE DISPLAY IMPAIR PROCESSING [J].
ERIKSEN, CW ;
ERIKSEN, BA .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1979, 26 (03) :195-205
[6]  
HEALY AF, 1987, EXECUTIVE CONTROL PR, P279
[7]   THEORY OF PERCEPTUAL MATCHING [J].
KRUEGER, LE .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1978, 85 (04) :278-304
[8]   EFFECT OF INTERMIXED FOVEAL AND PARAFOVEAL PRESENTATION ON SAME-DIFFERENT JUDGMENTS - EVIDENCE FOR A CRITERION-INERTIA MODEL [J].
KRUEGER, LE .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1985, 37 (03) :266-271
[9]   SAME DIFFERENT JUDGMENTS UNDER HIGH-SPEED STRESS - MISSING-FEATURE PRINCIPLE PREDOMINATES IN EARLY PROCESSING [J].
KRUEGER, LE ;
CHIGNELL, MH .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1985, 38 (02) :188-193
[10]  
Proctor R. W., 1990, STIMULUS RESPONSE CO