SUSCEPTIBILITY ARTIFACTS IN 2DFT SPIN-ECHO AND GRADIENT-ECHO IMAGING - THE CYLINDER MODEL REVISITED

被引:82
作者
BAKKER, CJG
BHAGWANDIEN, R
MOERLAND, MA
FUDERER, M
机构
[1] Department of Radiology, University Hospital Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht
[2] Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht
[3] Philips Medical Systems, Best
关键词
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; SUSCEPTIBILITY ARTIFACTS; GEOMETRIC DISTORTION; INTENSITY DISTORTION; T(2)ASTERISK;
D O I
10.1016/0730-725X(93)90473-Q
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Susceptibility-induced geometry and intensity distortions are a familiar observation in MR imaging. In the past few years several attempts have been made to aid in the understanding of susceptibility artifacts by means of simulation studies. Although these studies, which were mostly carried out with simple test objects, have produced some qualitative insight into chi-artifacts, the results lacked precision in describing finer details. In this paper we show the discrepancy between theory and experiment in previous work to be the result of an inadequate theoretical approach. In most studies so far, DELTAB0 effects are taken into account in the frequency domain, that is, after Fourier transformation of the data. In our view the simulation should follow the actual sequence of events in an imaging experiment and deal with the effect of error fields in the time domain (k-space) already. The correctness of this view is demonstrated here by comparing the results of time and frequency domain simulation against experimental observation f or a coaxial cylinder phantom, a widely used model in this type of work. Having established the superiority of the time domain simulation, we demonstrate its use in predicting chi-artifacts under various experimental conditions, for example, in spin-echo and gradient-echo imaging with a reduced number of phase-encoding steps.
引用
收藏
页码:539 / 548
页数:10
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Luedeke, Roeschmann, Tischler, Susceptibility artefacts in NMR imaging, Magn. Reson. Imaging, 3, pp. 329-343, (1985)
[2]  
Edmonds, Wormald, Theory of resonance in magnetically inhomogeneous specimens and some useful calculations, J. Magn. Reson., 77, pp. 223-232, (1988)
[3]  
Ericsson, Hemmingsson, Jung, Sperber, Calculation of MRI artifacts caused by static field disturbances, Phys. Med. Biol., 33, pp. 1103-1112, (1988)
[4]  
Callaghan, Susceptibility-limited resolution in nuclear magnetic resonance microscopy, J. Magn. Reson., 87, pp. 304-318, (1990)
[5]  
Chu, Xu, Balschi, Springer, Bulk magnetic susceptibility shifts in NMR studies of compartmentalized samples: Use of paramagnetic agents, Magn. Reson. Med., 13, pp. 239-262, (1990)
[6]  
Posse, Aue, Susceptibility artifacts in spin-echo and gradient-echo imaging, J. Magn. Reson., 88, pp. 473-492, (1990)
[7]  
Bhagwandien, Ee, Beersma, Bakker, Moerland, Lagendijk, Numerical analysis of the magnetic field for arbitrary magnetic susceptibility distributions in 2D, Magn. Reson. Imaging, 10, pp. 299-313, (1992)
[8]  
Ogawa, Lee, Magnetic resonance imaging of blood vessels at high fields: In vivo and in vitro measurements and image simulation, Magn. Reson. Imaging, 16, pp. 9-18, (1990)
[9]  
Chang, Geometrical image transformation to compensate for distortions in magnetic resonance imaging, Dissertation, (1990)
[10]  
Fitzpatrick, Chang, Willcott, Price, A technique for improving accuracy in position and intensity within images acquired in the presence of field inhomogeneity, Book of abstracts: Ninth Annual Meeting of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, (1990)