EXPERT SYSTEM VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION - A SURVEY AND TUTORIAL

被引:100
作者
OKEEFE, RM [1 ]
OLEARY, DE [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV SO CALIF,GRAD SCH BUSINESS,LOS ANGELES,CA 90089
关键词
EXPERT SYSTEMS; KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS; VERIFICATION; VALIDATION; TESTING; EVALUATION; CREDIBILITY; ASSESSMENT; DEVELOPMENT; LIFE CYCLE; STATISTICS;
D O I
10.1007/BF00849196
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Assuring the quality of an expert system is critical. A poor quality system may take costly errors resulting in considerable damage to the user or owner of the system. such as financial loss or human suffering. Hence verification and validation, methods and techniques aimed at ensuring quality, are fundamentally important. This paper surveys the issues, methods and techniques for verifying and validating expert systems. Approaches to defining the quality of a system are discussed, drawing upon work in both computing and the model building disciplines, which leads to definitions of verification and validation and the associated concepts of credibility, assessment and evaluation. An approach to verification based upon the detection of anomalies is presented. and related to the concepts of consistency, completeness. correctness and redundancy. Automated tools for expert system verification are reviewed. Considerable attention is then given to the issues in structuring the validation process, particularly the establishment of the criteria by which the system is judged, the need to maintain objectivity, and the concept of reliability. This is followed by a review of validation methods for validating both the components of a system and the system as a whole, and includes examples of some useful statistical methods. Management of the verification and validation process is then considered, and it is seen that the location of methods for verification and validation in the development life-cycle is of prime importance.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 42
页数:40
相关论文
共 112 条
[1]   EXPERIMENTS, QUASI-EXPERIMENTS, AND CASE-STUDIES - A REVIEW OF EMPIRICAL-METHODS FOR EVALUATING DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS [J].
ADELMAN, L .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS, 1991, 21 (02) :293-301
[2]  
ADRION WR, 1982, ACM COMPUT SURV, V14, P159, DOI DOI 10.1145/356876.356879
[3]  
AGARWAL R, 1992, INT J MAN MACH STUD, V26, P447
[4]  
BACHANT J, 1983, AI MAG, V5, P21
[5]   A METHODOLOGY FOR COST-RISK ANALYSIS IN THE STATISTICAL VALIDATION OF SIMULATION-MODELS [J].
BALCI, O ;
SARGENT, RG .
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 1981, 24 (04) :190-197
[6]  
BALCI O, 1987, 1987 P E SIM C SOC C
[7]  
Balci O, 1984, AM J MATH MANAGE SCI, V4, P375
[8]   SPECIFYING AN EXPERT SYSTEM [J].
BATAREKH, A ;
PREECE, AD ;
BENNETT, A ;
GROGONO, P .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 1991, 2 (04) :285-303
[9]  
Bellman K. L., 1990, Expert Systems with Applications, V1, P199, DOI 10.1016/0957-4174(90)90002-C
[10]  
Benbasat I., 1989, KNOWL ACQUIS, V1, P215, DOI [10.1016/S1042-8143(89)80020-2, DOI 10.1016/S1042-8143(89)80020-2]