ROOT DISTRIBUTION OF DACTYLADENIA-(ACIOA)-BARTERI AND SENNA-(CASSIA)-SIAMEA IN ALLEY CROPPING ON ULTISOL .2. IMPACT ON WATER REGIME AND CONSEQUENCES FOR EXPERIMENTAL-DESIGN

被引:11
作者
HAUSER, S
GICHURU, MP
机构
[1] Humid Forest Station, International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Messa, Yaounde
[2] International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Ibadan
关键词
SOIL WATER TENSION; ROOT BARRIERS; COMPETITION; NO-TREE CONTROL; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN;
D O I
10.1007/BF00705149
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Tensiometer measurements were carried out on a typic Paleudult in the humid forest zone of south eastern Nigeria in an alley cropping trial using fertilized and unfertilized Dactyladenia (Acioa) barteri and Senna (Cassia) siamea as hedgerow trees and a no-tree control. The interrow space of alley cropped and no-tree control plots were planted to maize/cassava intercrop. Water withdrawal during short dry spells and the dry season occurred fastest in the no-tree control plot and resembled the pattern in the adjacent S. siamea alley cropping. Previous root investigations showed that the whole no-tree control plot was within the range of root propagation of the adjacent hedgerow trees. Installation of a 70 cm deep root barrier led to a retarded water withdrawal in unfertilized no-tree control plots to a depth of 150 cm. In fertilized no-tree control this retardation occurred to a depth of 110 cm, while at 130 and 150 cm water withdrawal with root barriers was faster than without barriers. Results indicate that S. siamea depleted water resources in the no-tree control plot and shortened the growing season of cassava. Restricting roots to the assigned plot size can reduce competition for water in adjacent plots even in layers below the depth of the barrier but can also induce compensative water withdrawal from layers which were not necessarily affected by the barrier. It appears that currently no standard methodology is available to conduct agroforestry trials without the risk of invalidation through root interference. Methods to determine minimum plot size in order to reduce the risk of invalidation and misinterpretation of results are suggested.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 21
页数:13
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
Hauser S., Water and nutrient dynamics under alley cropping versus monocropping in the humid-subhumid transition zone, Transaction 14. ICSS, 6, pp. 204-209, (1990)
[2]  
Hauser S., Root distribution of Dactyladenia (Acioa) barteri and Senna (Cassia) siamea in alley cropping on ultisol. I. Implication for field experimentation, Agroforestry Systems, 24, pp. 111-121, (1993)
[3]  
Research Highlights of 1983, pp. 22-27, (1984)
[4]  
Annual Report for 1989 Resource and Crop Management Program, pp. 17-18, (1990)
[5]  
Kang B.T., Wilson G.F., The development of alley cropping as a promising agroforestry technology, Agroforestry: A Decade of Development, pp. 227-243, (1987)
[6]  
Kang B.T., Wilson G.F., Lawson T.L., Alley cropping a stable alternative to shifting cultivation, (1984)
[7]  
Kang B.T., Grimme H., Lawson T.L., Alley cropping sequentially cropped maize and cowpea with Leucaena on a sandy soil in southern Nigeria, Plant and Soil, 85, pp. 267-277, (1985)
[8]  
Kang B.T., Reynolds L., Atta-Krah A.N., Alley farming, Adv Agron, 43, pp. 315-359, (1990)
[9]  
Lal R., Myths and scientific realities of agroforestry as a strategy for sustainable management for soils in the tropics, Adv Soil Sci, 15, pp. 91-137, (1991)
[10]  
Singh R.P., Ong C.K., Saharan N., Above and below ground interactions in alley-cropping in semi arid India, Agroforestry Systems, 9, pp. 259-274, (1989)