COMPARISON OF SUBCUTANEOUS SUMATRIPTAN WITH USUAL ACUTE TREATMENTS FOR MIGRAINE

被引:18
作者
BOUREAU, F
CHAZOT, G
EMILE, J
BERTIN, L
DALLENS, H
BAPSTREITER
BES, A
BLAS, C
BRUNJOUSSET, G
CHATEL, M
COQUILLAT, G
COTES, F
DALUZEAU, N
DECHY, H
DEGOS, C
DEREUX, JF
DORDAIN, G
DUCLOS, H
DUMAS, M
EVREUX, M
GASTAUT, JL
GIL, R
GIRARD, D
GOAS, JY
GRANJON, YM
HENRY, P
JOYEUX, O
KHALIL, R
LAMBERT, P
LARMANDE, P
LAURENT, B
LAYET, A
LEJEUNNE, C
MALLECOURT, J
MASSIOU, H
MIHOUT, B
NEUSCHWANDER, P
TAPIE, P
RASCOL, A
REIS, J
ROGEZ, R
SAVET, JF
SERRATRICE, G
TOURNILHAC, M
TRISCHLER, JL
VERDIE, JC
VERRET, JM
机构
[1] GLAXO RES LABS,DEPT MED,F-75116 PARIS,FRANCE
[2] HOP ST ANTOINE,F-75571 PARIS,FRANCE
[3] HOP NEUROL,LYON,FRANCE
[4] HOP HOTEL DIEU,ANGERS,FRANCE
关键词
SUMATRIPTAN; ACUTE MIGRAINE; USUAL TREATMENTS; COMPARATIVE TRIAL; SEVERE MIGRAINE ATTACKS;
D O I
10.1159/000117146
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
246 migraine patients (International Headache Society definition, 1-6 severe attacks per month) were randomised into a multicentre, cross-over study comparing subcutaneous (s.c.) sumatriptan 6 mg administered by an auto-injector (Glare device) with usual acute migraine treatments. Patients were treated for 2 months or up to 12 attacks, and then crossed over to the alternative treatment for the same duration. Usual treatments were: analgesics (including combinations), 49%; ergotamine, 24%; NSAIDs 19%; DHE, 7%. Rescue medication was allowed 2 h after the first dose. Headache was assessed on a 4-point self-rating scale (0: none, 1: mild, 2: moderate, 3: severe). Other migraine symptoms were assessed as present or absent, Quality of life was assessed before the study and at the end of each treatment period, Two hundred and seventeen patients were eligible for the cross-over analysis, At 2 h post-dosing, an average of 78% of attacks per patient were successfully relieved (grade 3 or 2 to 1 or 0) by s.c. sumatriptan, compared with 34% for the usual treatments (p < 0.001) and 63% of attacks per patient were completely relieved (grade 0) by s.c. sumatriptan compared with 15% for the usual treatments (p < 0.001). Sumatriptan-treated patients used rescue medication for 19% of their attacks, compared to 59% for comparator drugs (p = 0.001). Results for patient preference were: s.c. sumatriptan, 85%; usual treatments, 10%; no preference, 5% (p < 0.001). Sumatriptan was significantly superior to comparator drugs for all other efficacy end-points (p < 0.001). Improvements in quality of life scores were 3 times higher in sumatriptan-treated patients than in those taking usual treatments (p < 0.0001); the tolerability of both treatments was good, In conclusion, s.c. sumatriptan was superior to the usual acute treatments for both the relief of all migraine symptoms and the improvement in quality of life.
引用
收藏
页码:264 / 269
页数:6
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON OF AN ACETAMINOPHEN 400 MG CODEINE 25 MG COMBINATION VERSUS ASPIRIN 1000 MG AND PLACEBO IN ACUTE MIGRAINE ATTACK [J].
BOUREAU, F ;
JOUBERT, JM ;
LASSERRE, V ;
PRUM, B ;
DELECOEUILLERIE, G .
CEPHALALGIA, 1994, 14 (02) :156-161
[2]   THE SAFETY AND TOLERABILITY OF SUMATRIPTAN - AN OVERVIEW [J].
BROWN, EG ;
ENDERSBY, CA ;
SMITH, RN ;
TALBOT, JCC .
EUROPEAN NEUROLOGY, 1991, 31 (05) :339-344
[3]  
Cull RE, 1992, BRIT J EC, V2, P103
[4]  
Davey P J, 1992, Pharmacoeconomics, V2, P5, DOI 10.2165/00019053-199202010-00002
[5]  
FITZPATRICK RM, 1988, HEADACHE PROBLEMS DI, P351
[6]   A NATIONWIDE SURVEY OF MIGRAINE IN FRANCE - PREVALENCE AND CLINICAL-FEATURES IN ADULTS [J].
HENRY, P ;
MICHEL, P ;
BROCHET, B ;
DARTIGUES, JF ;
TISON, S ;
SALAMON, R .
CEPHALALGIA, 1992, 12 (04) :229-237
[7]  
Osterhaus J T, 1992, Pharmacoeconomics, V2, P67, DOI 10.2165/00019053-199202010-00008
[8]   SUMATRIPTAN - A REAPPRAISAL OF ITS PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTIC EFFICACY IN THE ACUTE TREATMENT OF MIGRAINE AND CLUSTER HEADACHE [J].
PLOSKER, GL ;
MCTAVISH, D .
DRUGS, 1994, 47 (04) :622-651
[9]  
RICHARD A, 1993, THERAPIE, V48, P89
[10]   SUMATRIPTAN IN THE ACUTE TREATMENT OF MIGRAINE [J].
TANSEY, MJB ;
PILGRIM, AJ ;
LLOYD, K .
JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1993, 114 (01) :109-116