A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND-STUDY COMPARING CEFIXIME AND TRIMETHOPRIM-SULFAMETHOXAZOLE IN THE TREATMENT OF CHILDHOOD SHIGELLOSIS

被引:23
作者
ASHKENAZI, S
AMIR, J
WAISMAN, Y
RACHMEL, A
GARTY, BZ
SAMRA, Z
VARSANO, I
NITZAN, M
机构
[1] CHILDRENS HOSP, DEPT PEDIAT, DIV INFECT DIS, PETAH TIQWA, ISRAEL
[2] CHILDRENS HOSP, DEPT PEDIAT, DIV IMMUNOL, PETAH TIQWA, ISRAEL
[3] HASHARON HOSP, DEPT MICROBIOL, PETAH TIQWA, ISRAEL
[4] BEILINSON MED CTR, DEPT MICROBIOL, IL-49100 PETAH TIQWA, ISRAEL
[5] TEL AVIV UNIV, SACKLER FAC MED, IL-69978 TEL AVIV, ISRAEL
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0022-3476(05)80867-4
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
We compared the clinical and bacteriologic response of 5-day treatment with cefixime, 8 mg/kg per day, with the response to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), 10-50 mg/kg per day, the currently recommended therapy. Of the assessable children with acute, culture-proven shigellosis, 38 received cefixime and 39 received TMP-SMX. Pretreatment data on the two study groups were similar. In the first group, all isolates were susceptible to cefixime; in the TMP-SMX group, 32 isolotes were resistant and 7 were susceptible to TMP-SMX. Clinical response (day 5) showed cure, improvement, and failure in 89%,8%, and 3%, respectively, of the cefixime group, and in 25%, 44%, and 31%, respectively, of the TMP-SMX-resistant group (p < 0.001). Bacteriologic cure (day 3) occurred in 78% and 23% of the cefixime and TMP-SMX-resistant groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Clinical or bacteriologic relapse (day 12) was infrequent in both groups. The response to treatment of the cefixime and the TMP-SMX-susceptible groups was similar. No significant side effects were noted. We conclude that cefixime is superior to TMP-SMX in the treatment of suspected shigellosis in areas with a high rate of resistance to TMP-SMX.
引用
收藏
页码:817 / 821
页数:5
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   CONVULSIONS IN CHILDHOOD SHIGELLOSIS [J].
ASHKENAZI, S ;
DINARI, G ;
ZEVULUNOV, A ;
NITZAN, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DISEASES OF CHILDREN, 1987, 141 (02) :208-210
[2]  
ASHKENAZI S, IN PRESS CLIN INFECT
[3]   CEFIXIME - SPECTRUM OF ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY AGAINST 16016 CLINICAL ISOLATES [J].
BARRY, AL ;
JONES, RN .
PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE JOURNAL, 1987, 6 (10) :954-957
[4]  
BENNISH M, 1985, LANCET, V2, P441
[5]  
BLACK RE, 1984, PEDIATRICS, V73, P799
[6]   COMPARATIVE INVITRO ACTIVITY OF THE NEW ORAL CEPHALOSPORIN CEFIXIME [J].
COUNTS, GW ;
BAUGHER, LK ;
ULNESS, BK ;
HAMILTON, DJ .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1988, 7 (03) :428-431
[7]  
DuPont H L, 1988, Infect Dis Clin North Am, V2, P599
[8]  
FONTAINE O, 1989, REV INFECT DIS, V11, pS1145
[9]  
GOREN A, 1992, PEDIATRICS, V89, P1189
[10]  
GOTO N, 1985, CHEMOTHERAPY S6, V33, P46