CEPHALOMETRIC SCALING METHODOLOGY IN LIMITED SAMPLES

被引:3
作者
BRATTSTROM, V
MCWILLIAM, J
SEMB, G
机构
[1] Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm
[2] National Centre of Logopedics, Bredtvet, Oslo
关键词
D O I
10.1093/ejo/13.2.157
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
In longitudinal or cross-sectional cephalometric evaluation there are many factors which make analysis difficult. Samples are often limited in number and include both sexes. Registration may be done at different ages, using different equipment and techniques. By linear scaling size differences between sub-groups may be calibrated. Angular variables may still differ, however, suggesting differences in shape. If not, such sub-groups can be pooled, thus increasing the number of cases in each group and allowing more meaningful comparisons to be made with other groups. Calibration of biological size differences and/or technical effects of image enlargement may also be used to create a suitable baseline independent of growth, from which to study treatment effects.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 160
页数:4
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]  
Coben E.S., The integration of facial variants, American Journal of Orthodontics, 41, pp. 407-434, (1955)
[2]  
Draper N.R., Smith H., The examination of residuals, Applied Regression Analysis, 2Nd Edn, (1981)
[3]  
Hellsing E., McWilliam J., Reigo T., Spangfort E., The relationship between craniofacial morphology, head posture and spinal curvature in 8, 11 and 15 year old children, (1987)
[4]  
European Journal of Orthodontics, 9, pp. 254-264
[5]  
Lundstrom A., McWilliam J., A comparison of vertical and horizontal variables with regard to heritability, European Journal of Orthodontics, 9, pp. 104-108, (1987)
[6]  
Roos N., The soft tissue profile an x-ray cephalometric study, Monograph, (1974)
[7]  
Ross B., Treatment variables affecting facial growth in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Part 1: Treatment affecting growth, Cleft Palate Journal, 24, 1, (1987)
[8]  
Sassouni V., A roentgenographic cephalometric analysis of cephalo-facio-dental relationships, American Journal of Orthodontics, 41, pp. 735-764, (1955)