TILLERING, LEAF EXPANSION AND GROWTH OF PLANTS OF 2 CULTIVARS OF PERENNIAL RYEGRASS GROWN USING HYDROPONICS AT 2 WATER POTENTIALS

被引:58
作者
VANLOO, EN [1 ]
机构
[1] WAGENINGEN UNIV AGR, DEPT FIELD CROPS & GRASSLAND SCI, 6709 RZ WAGENINGEN, NETHERLANDS
关键词
LOLIUM-PERENNE L; PERENNIAL RYEGRASS; TILLERING; SITE FILLING; LEAF APPEARANCE; LEAF EXTENSION; GROWTH ANALYSIS; WATER POTENTIAL;
D O I
10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a088511
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Tillering and growth parameters of perennial ryegrass cultivars Wendy (diploid) and Condesa (tetraploid) were determined in a glasshouse experiment using hydroponics at low (—1.3 MPa) and normal water potential (0 MPa). At -1.3 MPa, leaf extension rate was reduced by 36%. Final plant tiller number was 20% lower at —1.3 MPa because of a 12% reduction in the leaf appearance rate in the first weeks after the start of the treatments. Site filling, the relative increase in tiller number per leaf appearance interval, was high (0.61)—but still lower than theoretically possible—and was only slightly affected by water potential. Site filling was shown to be strictly related to the number of inhibited plus unemerged tiller buds. Dry matter production was 64% lower at —1.3 MPa. Relative growth rate (RGR) was, on average, 17% lower at — 1.3 MPa, but the reduction was greater just after the treatments started. Also, net assimilation rate (NAR) was reduced more by low water potential just after the start of the treatments. Specific leaf area (SLA) was 13% lower at — 1.3 MPa for Wendy, but not significantly reduced for Condesa. Contrary to expectations based on the theory of the functional balance between root and shoot, leaf weight ratio was slightly higher at —1.3 MPa. From comparison of the results of this study with published data, it is concluded that effects of drought in the field on tillering cannot be attributed only to low water potential. © 1992 Annals of Botany Company.
引用
收藏
页码:511 / 518
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1989, SIMULATION MONOGRAPH
[2]  
Barker D. J., 1985, Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association, V46, P57
[3]  
BARKER DJ, 1989, 16 P INT GRASSL C NI, P503
[4]  
BROUWER R., 1962, NETHERLANDS JOUR AGRIC SCI, V10, P361
[5]   LEAF TISSUE REMAINING AFTER CUTTING AND REGROWTH IN PERENNIAL RYEGRASS [J].
DAVIES, A .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 1974, 82 (FEB) :165-172
[6]   RATES OF LEAF AND TILLER PRODUCTION IN YOUNG SPACED PERENNIAL RYEGRASS PLANTS IN RELATION TO SOIL-TEMPERATURE AND SOLAR-RADIATION [J].
DAVIES, A ;
THOMAS, H .
ANNALS OF BOTANY, 1983, 51 (05) :591-597
[7]   SENSING OF SOIL-WATER STATUS AND THE REGULATION OF PLANT-GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT [J].
DAVIES, WJ ;
MANSFIELD, TA ;
HETHERINGTON, AM .
PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT, 1990, 13 (07) :709-719
[8]   EFFECTS OF WATER-SUPPLY ON PARTITIONING OF DRY-MATTER BETWEEN ROOTS AND SHOOTS IN LOLIUM-PERENNE [J].
GALES, K .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 1979, 16 (03) :863-877
[9]  
JOHNSON IR, 1983, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V6, P721, DOI 10.1111/1365-3040.ep11588103_6_9
[10]  
Jones M. B., 1988, The grass crop. The physiological basis of production, P205