Is Adding the E Enough? Investigating the Impact of K-12 Engineering Standards on the Implementation of STEM Integration

被引:156
作者
Roehrig, Gillian H. [1 ]
Moore, Tamara J. [1 ]
Wang, Hui-Hui [1 ]
Park, Mi Sun [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
curriculum; math/math education; professional development; Science/science education; standards; teachers and teaching;
D O I
10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00112.x
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The problems that we face in our ever-changing, increasingly global society are multidisciplinary, and many require the integration of multiple science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) concepts to solve them. National calls for improvement of STEM education in the United States are driving changes in policy, particularly in academic standards. Research on STEM integration in K-12 classrooms has not kept pace with the sweeping policy changes in STEM education. This study addresses the need for research to explore the translation of broad, national-level policy statements regarding STEM education and integration to state-level policies and implementation in K-12 classrooms. An interpretive multicase study design was employed to conduct an in-depth investigation of secondary STEM teachers' implementation of STEM integration in their classrooms during a yearlong professional development program. The interpretive approach was used because it provides holistic descriptions and explanations for the particular phenomenon, in this case STEM integration. The results of this study demonstrate the possibilities of policies that use state standards documents as a mechanism to integrate engineering into science standards. Our cases suggest that STEM integration can be implemented most successfully when mathematics and science teachers work together both in a single classroom (co-teaching) and in multiple classrooms (content teaching-common theme).
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 44
页数:14
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission, 2010, CRIT ACCCR ENG PROGR
[2]  
BEANE J, 1991, EDUC LEADERSHIP, V49, P9
[3]  
BEANE JA, 1995, PHI DELTA KAPPAN, V76, P616
[4]   Advancing Engineering Education in P-12 Classrooms [J].
Brophy, Sean ;
Klein, Stacy ;
Portsmore, Merredith ;
Rogers, Chris .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2008, 97 (03) :369-387
[5]  
BURROWS S, 1989, B MED LIBR ASSOC, V77, P245
[6]  
Capraro R. M., 2008, PROJECT BASED LEARNI
[7]  
Childress V., 1996, J TECHNOLOGY ED, V8, P16, DOI DOI 10.21061/JTE.V8I1.A.2
[8]  
Council N.R., 1996, NAT SCI ED STAND
[9]  
Cramer K, 2003, BEYOND CONSTRUCTIVISM: MODELS AND MODELING PERSPECTIVES ON MATHEMATICS PROBLEM SOLVING, LEARNING AND TEACHING, P449
[10]  
Creswell J.W., 2017, QUAL INQ