COMMUNITY-ACQUIRED BACTEREMIAS FROM TUNNELED CENTRAL INTRAVENOUS LINES - RESULTS FROM STUDIES OF A SINGLE VENDOR

被引:5
作者
BROWN, RB
CIPRIANI, D
SCHULTE, M
CORL, A
PIECZARKA, R
机构
[1] Infectious Disease Division, Department of Infection Control, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield
[2] Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0196-6553(94)90003-5
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Tunneled central intravenous catheters are a common method for rendering prolonged outpatient intravenous therapy. Their safety, however, has not been well studied. We conducted a retrospective evaluation of bacteremias associated with tunneled central intravenous catheters managed by a single home health care vendor during a 1-year period. All catheters were inserted in the operating room under sterile conditions. To calculate total line days, the dates of catheter insertion and removal were obtained from either the hospital operating room or the home health care agency. Catheter care was conducted according to written protocols. Total line days were calculated. Community-acquired bacteremia (defined as bacteremia occurring more than 6 days after the patients' discharge from the hospital) was determined from records available in the infection control department. Sixty-eight patients received intravenous therapy from the vendor during the 1-year study period. Total line days were 5548 (median 52 days/patient). Eleven episodes of bacteremia occurred in five patients, providing an incidence density rate of 2.0 infections/1000 catheter days. The most frequent bacteria encountered were Staphylococcus epidermidis (five), Klebsiella pneumoniae (two), and Acinetobacter calcoaceticus var anitratus (two). Median time to bacteremia was 103 days. Two patients, both younger than 4 years, accounted for seven of the infections; both had short-bowel syndrome. On the basis of historical comparisons, outpatient intravenous therapy appears to be associated with a lower risk of bacteremia than in-hospital therapy. These data can provide quality improvement information and may be a means for comparing home infusion therapy vendors.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 151
页数:3
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Graham, Nosohusial Infections, Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice, 2, pp. 158-161, (1993)
  • [2] Tice, Introduction to outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy symposium, Hosp Pract, 28, (1993)
  • [3] Fuchs, Gusafson, King, Goodall, Assessment of catheter-associated infection risk with the Hickman right atrial catheter, Infect Control, 5, pp. 226-230, (1984)
  • [4] Begala, Maher, Cherry, Risk of infection associated with the use of Broviac and Hickman catheters, Am J Infect Control, 10, pp. 17-23, (1982)
  • [5] Pemberton, Lyman, Lander, Covinsky, Sepsis from triple- vs single-lumen catheters during total parenteral nutrition in surgical or critically ill patients, Arch Surg, 121, pp. 591-594, (1986)
  • [6] Press, Ramsey, Larson, Fefer, Hickman, Hickman catheter infections in patients with malignancies, Medicine, 63, pp. 189-200, (1984)
  • [7] Hilton, Haslett, Borenstein, Tucci, Isenberg, Singer, Central catheter infections: single- versus triple-lumen catheters, Am J Med, 84, pp. 667-672, (1988)
  • [8] Yeung, May, Hughes, Infection rate for single lumen v triple lumen subclavian catheters, Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 9, pp. 154-158, (1988)
  • [9] May, Davis, Percutaneous catheters and totally implantable access systems: a review of reported infection rates, J Intravenous Nurs, 11, pp. 97-103, (1988)
  • [10] Smego, Gainer, Home intravenous antimicrobial therapy provided by a community hospital and a university hospital, Am J Hosp Pharm, 42, pp. 2185-2189, (1985)