Chemotherapy Dosing Strategies in the Obese, Elderly, and Thin Patient: Results of a Nationwide Survey

被引:78
作者
Field, Kathryn M.
Kosmider, Suzanne
Jefford, Michael
Michael, Michael
Jennens, Ross
Green, Michael
Gibbs, Peter
机构
[1] Western Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Footscray, Vic, Australia
[2] Peter MacCallum Canc Ctr, East Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Royal Melbourne Hosp, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[4] Univ Melbourne, Fac Med Dent & Hlth Sci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JOP.0832001
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Determining the optimal starting dose of chemotherapy (CHT) presents a considerable challenge when using bodysurface area (BSA)-based dosing, particularly in obese, elderly, or thin patients. We sought to document the range of approaches employed when administering CHT to these patients. Methods: A questionnaire was developed by a panel of oncologists and mailed to all members of the Medical Oncology Group of Australia. Results: From 315 oncologists, 188 responded (response rate 59.7%). BSA-based dosing is standard practice for 176 (97.2%) of the responding oncologists. In the adjuvant disease setting, 23 (12.7%) use ideal rather than actual body weight (BW) to calculate BSA, or choose whichever is less. When treating obese patients, only 6.1% of respondents routinely use actual BW. Of the remainder, 69.5% either cap the dose at 2 m(2) or use ideal BW. In underweight patients, 95% (n = 171) routinely calculate BSA using actual BW. Forty one respondents (22.7%) routinely reduce dose in the fit elderly. Conclusion: This analysis of BSA-based CHT dosing methods demonstrates significant variability in practice. Based on evidence from adjuvant studies showing that actual BSA-based dosing is desirable, a substantial number of Australian patients are being underdosed. Further education, together with ongoing research, is required to optimize individualized dosing for efficacy and tolerability.
引用
收藏
页码:108 / 113
页数:6
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2004, AUSTR SOC TRENDS 200
[2]   Role of body surface area in dosing of investigational anticancer agents in adults, 1991-2001 [J].
Baker, SD ;
Verweij, J ;
Rowinsky, EK ;
Donehower, RC ;
Schellens, JHM ;
Grochow, LB ;
Sparreboom, A .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2002, 94 (24) :1883-1888
[3]  
Balducci L, 2001, CURR PROB CANCER, V25, P7
[4]  
Balducci L, 2000, Oncologist, V5, P224, DOI 10.1634/theoncologist.5-3-224
[5]   Body mass index as a prognostic feature in operable breast cancer:: the International Breast Cancer Study Group experience [J].
Berclaz, G ;
Li, S ;
Price, KN ;
Coates, AS ;
Castiglione-Gertsch, M ;
Rudenstam, CM ;
Holmberg, SB ;
Lindtner, J ;
Erzen, D ;
Collins, J ;
Snyder, R ;
Thürlimann, B ;
Fey, MF ;
Mendiola, C ;
Werner, ID ;
Simoncini, E ;
Crivellari, D ;
Gelber, RD ;
Goldhirsch, A ;
International Breast Cancer Study Grp .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2004, 15 (06) :875-884
[6]   Is pharmacokinetically guided chemotherapy dosage a better way forward? [J].
Bergh, J .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2002, 13 (03) :343-344
[7]   Dose and dose intensity as determinants of outcome in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer [J].
Budman, DR ;
Berry, DA ;
Cirrincione, CT ;
Henderson, IC ;
Wood, WC ;
Weiss, RB ;
Ferree, CR ;
Muss, HB ;
Green, MR ;
Norton, L ;
Frei, E .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1998, 90 (16) :1205-1211
[8]   Can we individualise chemotherapy for colorectal cancer? [J].
Chan, R ;
Kerr, DJ .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2004, 15 (07) :996-999
[9]  
Daling JR, 2001, CANCER, V92, P720, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(20010815)92:4<720::AID-CNCR1375>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-T