RECOVERY OF NEUROSENSORY FUNCTION FOLLOWING ORTHOGNATHIC SURGERY

被引:82
作者
KARAS, ND
BOYD, SB
SINN, DP
机构
[1] HENRY FORD HOSP,DIV ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURG,2799 W GRAND BLVD,DETROIT,MI 48202
[2] UNIV TEXAS,SW MED CTR,DIV ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURG,DALLAS,TX 75230
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0278-2391(10)80199-5
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to prospectively define the recovery of touch discrimination following four commonly performed surgical procedures in 22 consecutive patients with no previous maxillofacial surgery. The surgical groups studied were Le Fort I osteotomy (LEFORT; n = 13), sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO; n = 6), intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO; n = 9), and isolated genioplasty (GENIO; n = 5). Neurosensory function was assessed by three different testing modalities which included static light touch (SLT), moving touch discrimination (MTD), and two-point discrimination (TPD). Cutaneous sensation of the lower lip and chin were examined for the mandibular procedures, whereas the infraorbital and upper lip regions were evaluated following maxillary surgery. Immediately following surgery, each group varied in both the incidence and magnitude of neurosensory deficits (NSD). The SSRO group had the highest percentage of sites with immediate postsurgical NSD to both SLT (72%) and MTD (67%), followed by the LEFORT (SLT = 50%, MTD = 58%), GENIO (SLT = 27%, MTD = 6%), and IVRO groups (SLT = 11%, MTD = 18%), respectively. Each group also varied in the severity of the initial postoperative deficit as measured by SLT, with the SSRO group showing the greatest deficit followed by the LEFORT, GENIO, and IVRO groups. During the 6-month recovery period each group approached preoperative levels of sensation at a different rate. The LEFORT group recovered most rapidly, with few anatomic sites showing NSD (SLT = 20%, MTD = 5%) at the 1-month postoperative examination, and the majority of the group (96%) returned to preoperative sensation by 3 months following surgery. The SSRO group recovered more slowly, with approximately half of the group demonstrating a deficit (SLT = 50%, MTD = 59%) at 1 month, which diminished to about one fourth of the sites (SLT = 25%, MTD = 5%) by 3 months. Most of the SSRO group (90%) exhibited no residual deficit 6 months following surgery. The IVRO group had few sites with immediate NSD (SLT = 11%, MTD = 15%). In none of the surgical groups was a statistically significant correlation found between the severity of the initial NSD and length of time to complete recovery. © 1990, American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. All rights reserved.. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:124 / 134
页数:11
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
BEHRMAN SJ, 1972, J ORAL SURG, V30, P554
[2]  
BELL WH, 1980, SURGICAL CORRECTION, V1
[3]  
BELL WH, 1980, SURGICAL CORRECTION, V2
[4]   FUNCTIONAL DISTURBANCES OF THE INFERIOR ALVEOLAR NERVE AFTER SAGITTAL OSTEOTOMY OF THE MANDIBULAR RAMUS - OPERATING TECHNIQUE FOR PREVENTION [J].
BRUSATI, R ;
FIAMMINGHI, L ;
SESENNA, E ;
GAZZOTTI, A .
JOURNAL OF MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1981, 9 (02) :123-125
[5]   ASSESSMENT OF RECOVERY FROM INJURY TO INFERIOR ALVEOLAR AND MENTAL NERVES [J].
CAMPBELL, RL ;
SHAMASKIN, RG ;
HARKINS, SW .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1987, 64 (05) :519-526
[6]   NEUROLOGICAL DAMAGE AFTER SAGITTAL SPLIT OSTEOTOMY [J].
COGHLAN, KM ;
IRVINE, GH .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1986, 15 (04) :369-371
[7]   SENSORY NERVE MORBIDITY FOLLOWING LE FORT-I OSTEOTOMY [J].
DEJONGH, M ;
BARNARD, D ;
BIRNIE, D .
JOURNAL OF MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1986, 14 (01) :10-13
[8]   THE RESPONSE OF THE PERIPHERAL BRANCHES OF THE TRIGEMINAL NERVE TO TRAUMA [J].
FERDOUSI, AM ;
MACGREGOR, AJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL SURGERY, 1985, 14 (01) :41-46
[9]  
FREIHOFER H P M JR, 1975, Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery, V3, P250, DOI 10.1016/S0301-0503(75)80051-8
[10]   FURTHER REFINEMENT AND EVALUATION OF INTRAORAL VERTICAL RAMUS OSTEOTOMY [J].
HALL, HD ;
MCKENNA, SJ .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1987, 45 (08) :684-688