EFFECTIVENESS OF ANTENATAL CARE - A POPULATION-BASED STUDY

被引:66
作者
BACKE, B [1 ]
NAKLING, J [1 ]
机构
[1] LILLEHAMMER DIST GEN HOSP, DEPT OBSTET & GYNAECOL, LILLEHAMMER, NORWAY
来源
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY | 1993年 / 100卷 / 08期
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1471-0528.1993.tb14263.x
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective To analyse the effectiveness of antenatal care as a screening for no Design Programme evaluation of antenatal care in a geographically based cohort. Setting Routine clinical practice in primary and specialist level of health care without intervention. Subjects One thousand nine hundred and eight women residing in one Norwegian county giving birth during a 12 month period, 1988 to 1989. Outcome measures The detection rates at the time of delivery, for women with five conditions: twin pregnancies, placenta praevia, breech presentation, small for gestational age (SGA) and pre-eclampsia. Results Two hundred and ninety-two women had one or more of the actual conditions, 124 (42%) had been diagnosed at the time of the delivery. The detection rate for SGA was remarkably low (14%). The detection rates for pre-eclampsia (75%), breech presentation (69%), placenta praevia (57%) and twin pregnancies (94%) were in the same range as results reported in the literature. The number of false positive antenatal diagnosis was insignificant. Conclusions Assessing the effectiveness of antenatal diagnosis of growth retardation is connected with major unsolved methodological problems. Clinical management of such cases may be better than indicated by the results based on the ultimate SGA classification. For important obstetrical conditions this study describes an applicable method for practical evaluation of the effectiveness of antenatal care. Areas where care could be improved are demonstrated.
引用
收藏
页码:727 / 732
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
ALTMAN DG, 1989, EFFECTIVE CARE PREGN, P411
[2]  
American Academy of Pediatrics and The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2012, GUID PER CAR
[3]  
BACKE B, 1991, 391 NORW I HOSP RES
[4]  
Bakketeig L S, 1992, Int J Technol Assess Health Care, V8 Suppl 1, P139
[5]  
BAKKETEIG LS, 1984, LANCET, V2, P207
[6]  
BJERKEDAL T, 1980, J NORWEG MED ASS, V100, P1088
[7]   PREDICTION OF FETAL GROWTH DEVIATION BY ULTRASONIC BIOMETRY .1. METHODOLOGY [J].
EIKNES, SH ;
GROTTUM, P ;
PERSSON, PH ;
MARSAL, K .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1982, 61 (01) :53-58
[8]  
FRASER R, 1989, EFFECTIVE CARE PREGN, P594
[9]   PREMATURITY, POSTDATES, AND GROWTH-RETARDATION - THE INFLUENCE OF USE OF ULTRASONOGRAPHY ON REPORTED GESTATIONAL-AGE [J].
GOLDENBERG, RL ;
DAVIS, RO ;
CUTTER, GR ;
HOFFMAN, HJ ;
BRUMFIELD, CG ;
FOSTER, JM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1989, 160 (02) :462-470
[10]  
GRENNERT L, 1978, ACTA OBSTET GYN SCAN, P5