Intellectual capital and performance of pharmaceutical firms in India

被引:152
作者
Vishnu, Sriranga [1 ]
Gupta, Vijay Kumar [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Management, Finance & Accounting, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
关键词
Performance; Intellectual capital; Relational capital; Pharmaceutical sector; Return on assets; VAIC (TM);
D O I
10.1108/JIC-04-2013-0049
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to study the relationship between intellectual capital (IC) and performance of pharmaceutical firms in India. The secondary objective is to propose and test modified models of Value Added Intellectual Coefficient (VAIC (TM)) method. Design/methodology/approach - Data on 22 large pharmaceutical firms collected for empirical investigation. Return on assets and return on sales are performance variables. IC and its components - human capital, structural capital and relational capital (RC), are predictor variables. Three extended and modified VAIC (TM) models (e-VAIC (TM)) are proposed. Multiple regression technique is applied on pooled data to draw inferences. Findings - Results show instances of positive relationship between IC and performance variables. RC, the new variable, does not demonstrate statistically significant relationship with performance variables. Research limitations/implications - Due to inadequate reporting of IC and its components, availability of data on various proxies is difficult. The new models proposed in this paper can be a template for future research and model development. Practical implications - VAIC (TM) model, the proposed models (e-VAIC (TM)) and the result analysis can be useful for evaluation and value creation purposes. Originality/value - Previous researchers use original VAIC (TM) model. This paper modifies and extends the model in accordance with contemporary description and typology of IC. Inclusion of RC as a variable in VAIC (TM) model and use of new proxies for components of IC are the novelties of this paper.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / +
页数:18
相关论文
共 66 条
  • [1] Abdulsalam F., 2011, BUSINESS, V3, P88, DOI [10.4236/ib.2011.31014, DOI 10.4236/IB.2011.31014]
  • [2] Abidin, 2009, INT J EC FINANCE, V1, P150, DOI DOI 10.5539/IJEF.V1N1P150
  • [3] Barros L. J., 2010, J ACAD BUSINESS EC, V10, P39
  • [4] Bharathi K. G., 2010, PAKISTAN J COMMERCE, V4, P81
  • [5] Bhartesh K. R, 2005, FINANCE INDIA, V19, P1365
  • [6] Bhasin M. L., 2011, MODERN EC, V2, P455
  • [7] Bollen L., 2005, Management Decision, V43, P1161, DOI 10.1108/00251740510626254
  • [8] Assessing knowledge assets: a review of the models used to measure intellectual capital
    Bontis, N
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS, 2001, 3 (01) : 41 - 60
  • [9] Bontis N., 1999, EUR MANAG J, V17, P391, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0263-2373(99)00019-5
  • [10] Brennan N., 2000, J INTELLECT CAP, V1, P206, DOI [10.1108/14691930010350792, DOI 10.1108/14691930010350792]