RAPID ACTIVATION OF A NOVEL PLANT DEFENSE GENE IS STRICTLY DEPENDENT ON THE ARABIDOPSIS-RPM1 DISEASE RESISTANCE LOCUS

被引:116
作者
KIEDROWSKI, S
KAWALLECK, P
HAHLBROCK, K
SOMSSICH, IE
DANGL, JL [1 ]
机构
[1] MAX PLANCK INST ZUCHTUNGSFORSCH,MAX DELBRUCK LAB,CARL VON LINNE WEG 10,W-5000 COLOGNE 30,GERMANY
[2] MAX PLANCK INST ZUCHTUNGSFORSCH,DEPT BIOCHEM,W-5000 COLOGNE 30,GERMANY
关键词
ARABIDOPSIS; BACTERIAL AVIRULENCE GENE; DISEASE RESISTANCE GENE; PLANT DEFENSE; PSEUDOMONAS-SYRINGAE;
D O I
10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05572.x
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
We cloned and sequenced cDNAs encoded by a novel plant defense gene, ELI3, from parsley and Arabidopsis thaliana. The predicted product shares no homology to known sequences. ELI3 mRNA accumulates in A.thaliana leaves in response to challenge with phytopathogenic Pseudomonas syringae strains. The timing and magnitude of this response are dictated by the genetics of the plant-pathogen interaction being analyzed. During incompatible interactions, where resistance in the plant genotype Col-0 is dictated by the dominant RPM1 locus, ELI3 mRNA accumulates to high levels 5-10 h post-inoculation. This kinetic behavior is also generated by the presence of a cloned bacterial avirulence gene, in otherwise virulent bacteria, which triggers resistance mediated via RPM1 action. The phenotypic outcome is a hypersensitive resistance reaction visible 8-15 h post-infiltration. Thus, the induction kinetics of ELI3 mRNA accumulation are consistent with a functional role for the ELI3 gene product in establishing the resistant phenotype. In contrast, during compatible interactions with the susceptible plant genotype Nd-0, which is homozygous recessive at the rpm1 locus, ELI3 mRNA accumulates significantly only after 15 h. We show genetically that EL13 activation is strictly dependent on the presence of dominant alleles at RPM1 using an assay generalizable to any pathogen induced plant defense phenomena.
引用
收藏
页码:4677 / 4684
页数:8
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] ALLARD R. W., 1956, HILGARDIA, V24, P235
  • [2] AUSUBEL FM, 1991, ADV MOL GENETICS PLA, V1, P357
  • [3] DIFFERENTIAL ACCUMULATION OF PLANT DEFENSE GENE TRANSCRIPTS IN A COMPATIBLE AND AN INCOMPATIBLE PLANT-PATHOGEN INTERACTION
    BELL, JN
    RYDER, TB
    WINGATE, VPM
    BAILEY, JA
    LAMB, CJ
    [J]. MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY, 1986, 6 (05) : 1615 - 1623
  • [4] BELL JN, 1984, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V83, P3384
  • [5] BREATHNACH R, 1981, ANNU REV BIOCHEM, V50, P349, DOI 10.1146/annurev.bi.50.070181.002025
  • [6] PLANT GENE-EXPRESSION IN RESPONSE TO PATHOGENS
    COLLINGE, DB
    SLUSARENKO, AJ
    [J]. PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1987, 9 (04) : 389 - 410
  • [7] Crute I. R., 1985, MECH RESISTANCE PLAN, P80, DOI [10.1007/978-94-009-5145-7_5, DOI 10.1007/978-94-009-5145-7_5]
  • [8] CRUTE IR, 1985, MECHANISMS RESISTANC, P197
  • [9] Dangl J. L., 1992, Genes involved in plant defense., P303
  • [10] DANGL JL, 1992, IN PRESS INT REV CYT, V144