MRI OF LIVER METASTASES FROM COLORECTAL-CANCER VS CT DURING ARTERIAL PORTOGRAPHY

被引:88
作者
SOYER, P
LEVESQUE, M
CAUDRON, C
ELIAS, D
ZEITOUN, G
ROCHE, A
机构
[1] HOP LOUIS MOURIER,DEPT RADIOL,F-92701 COLOMBES,FRANCE
[2] HOP LOUIS MOURIER,DEPT SURG,F-92701 COLOMBES,FRANCE
[3] INST GUSTAVE ROUSSY,DEPT RADIOL,F-94805 VILLEJUIF,FRANCE
[4] INST GUSTAVE ROUSSY,DEPT SURG,F-94805 VILLEJUIF,FRANCE
关键词
LIVER; NEOPLASMS; PORTOGRAPHY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; TECHNIQUES;
D O I
10.1097/00004728-199301000-00012
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
A prospective study was performed to compare, with a lesion-by-lesion analysis, the sensitivities of high field strength MRI and CT during arterial portography (CTAP) in detecting hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. Twenty-one patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer were prospectively investigated by high field strength MRI (1.5 or 2 T) and CTAP. High field strength MRI was performed with pre and post gadopentetate dimeglumine enhanced T1-weighted SE sequences and T2-weighted SE sequences. All patients underwent partial hepatectomy and 37 metastases were surgically and pathologically proved. The metastasis detection rate (sensitivity) was 94% (35 of 37) for CTAP and 78% (29 of 37) for high field strength MRI. The 16% (95% confidence interval: 1-31%) difference in sensitivity between CTAP and high field strength MRI was statistically significant (p < 0.05, McNemar test). The use of gadopentetate dimeglumine did not improve the sensitivity of T1-weighted SE sequences. Since our study demonstrated significant difference in sensitivities between high field strength MRI and CTAP in our group of patients, we can conclude that high field strength MRI cannot replace CTAP in the preoperative evaluation of patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Computed tomography during arterial portography must be considered as the preoperative gold standard.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 74
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
ADSON MA, 1984, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V119, P647
[2]   CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE OF HUMAN COLORECTAL-CANCER METASTASIS [J].
AUGUST, DA ;
OTTOW, RT ;
SUGARBAKER, PH .
CANCER AND METASTASIS REVIEWS, 1984, 3 (04) :303-324
[3]   DETECTION OF COLORECTAL LIVER METASTASES USING INTRAOPERATIVE ULTRASONOGRAPHY [J].
CHARNLEY, RM ;
MORRIS, DL ;
DENNISON, AR ;
AMAR, SS ;
HARDCASTLE, JD .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1991, 78 (01) :45-48
[4]  
COUINAUD C, 1957, ETUDES ANATOMIQUES C, P92
[5]   HEPATIC PSEUDOLESION - APPEARANCE OF FOCAL LOW ATTENUATION IN THE MEDIAL SEGMENT OF THE LEFT LOBE AT CT ARTERIAL PORTOGRAPHY [J].
FERNANDEZ, MD ;
BERNARDINO, ME .
RADIOLOGY, 1991, 181 (03) :809-812
[6]   LIVER-TUMOR IMAGING - CURRENT CONCEPTS [J].
FERRUCCI, JT .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1990, 155 (03) :473-484
[7]   MULTIVARIATE-ANALYSIS OF A PERSONAL SERIES OF 247 CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS WITH LIVER METASTASES FROM COLORECTAL-CANCER .1. TREATMENT BY HEPATIC RESECTION [J].
FORTNER, JG ;
SILVA, JS ;
GOLBEY, RB ;
COX, EB ;
MACLEAN, BJ .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1984, 199 (03) :306-316
[8]   PREOPERATIVE IMAGING OF LIVER METASTASES - COMPARISON OF ANGIOGRAPHY, CT SCAN, AND ULTRASONOGRAPHY [J].
GUNVEN, P ;
MAKUUCHI, M ;
TAKAYASU, K ;
MORIYAMA, N ;
YAMASAKI, S ;
HASEGAWA, H .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1985, 202 (05) :573-579
[9]   FOCAL LIVER-LESIONS - MR IMAGING WITH MN-DPDP - INITIAL CLINICAL-RESULTS IN 40 PATIENTS [J].
HAMM, B ;
VOGL, TJ ;
BRANDING, G ;
SCHNELL, B ;
TAUPITZ, M ;
WOLF, KJ ;
LISSNER, J .
RADIOLOGY, 1992, 182 (01) :167-174
[10]   DETECTION OF FOCAL HEPATIC MASSES - PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION WITH CT, DELAYED CT, CT DURING ARTERIAL PORTOGRAPHY, AND MR IMAGING [J].
HEIKEN, JP ;
WEYMAN, PJ ;
LEE, JKT ;
BALFE, DM ;
PICUS, D ;
BRUNT, EM ;
FLYE, MW .
RADIOLOGY, 1989, 171 (01) :47-51