COMMENTARY AND OPINION .3. SOME NONONTOLOGICAL AND FUNCTIONALLY UNCONNECTED VIEWS ON CURRENT ISSUES IN THE ANALYSIS OF PET DATASETS

被引:18
作者
FORD, I
机构
[1] Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, University of Glasgow, Scotland
关键词
D O I
10.1038/jcbfm.1995.46
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Strother et al. (1995) and Friston (1995) both raise important issues and provide useful reviews of various aspects of PET data analysis. Statisticians would not assume that any single piece of methodology would answer all questions about a type of data in a variety of experimental and observational contexts. The fundamental importance of hypothesis-driven inference, based on well designed experiments, cannot be overestimated for its ability to progress scientific understanding in an orderly manner. However, hypothesis-generating experiments are also vital in their own right. In practice, we generally do not have the luxury of both types of experiment, and we should note Strother et al.'s comment on the importance of extracting as much information as possible from each dataset. Friston (1995) also sees formal testing methods and exploratory methods such as principal components analysis as complementary. The correct approach would therefore seem to be (a) to select methods for formal and exploratory data analysis from the rich existing tool kit of statistical procedures, (b) to modify these as necessary to deal with special PET problems such as multiplicity, (c) to be aware of the assumptions underlying the methods being used and to investigate the problems that can arise if these assumptions fail to hold, (d) to appreciate the complexity of both PET data and of the potential questions that can be asked of it, and (e) to be aware of the limitations of any statistical analysis and the need for caution in interpreting conclusions not based on any predefined hypothesis.
引用
收藏
页码:371 / 377
页数:7
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   ENHANCED DETECTION OF FOCAL BRAIN RESPONSES USING INTERSUBJECT AVERAGING AND CHANGE-DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS OF SUBTRACTED PET IMAGES [J].
FOX, PT ;
MINTUN, MA ;
REIMAN, EM ;
RAICHLE, ME .
JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM, 1988, 8 (05) :642-653
[2]   COMPARING FUNCTIONAL (PET) IMAGES - THE ASSESSMENT OF SIGNIFICANT CHANGE [J].
FRISTON, KJ ;
FRITH, CD ;
LIDDLE, PF ;
FRACKOWIAK, RSJ .
JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM, 1991, 11 (04) :690-699
[3]   COMMENTARY AND OPINION .2. STATISTICAL PARAMETRIC MAPPING - ONTOLOGY AND CURRENT ISSUES [J].
FRISTON, KJ .
JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM, 1995, 15 (03) :361-370
[4]  
FRISTON KJ, 1990, J CEREB BLOOD FLOW M, V10, P245
[5]  
HOLMES AP, 1995, IN PRESS CEREB BLOOD
[6]  
Mardia K.V., 1979, MULTIVARIATE ANAL
[7]   SCALED SUBPROFILE MODEL - A STATISTICAL APPROACH TO THE ANALYSIS OF FUNCTIONAL PATTERNS IN POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHIC DATA [J].
MOELLER, JR ;
STROTHER, SC ;
SIDTIS, JJ ;
ROTTENBERG, DA .
JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM, 1987, 7 (05) :649-658
[8]  
Snedecor G.W., 1980, STAT METHODS
[9]   COMMENTARY AND OPINION .1. PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS, VARIANCE PARTITIONING, AND FUNCTIONAL CONNECTIVITY [J].
STROTHER, SC ;
KANNO, I ;
ROTTENBERG, DA .
JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM, 1995, 15 (03) :353-360
[10]   A 3-DIMENSIONAL STATISTICAL-ANALYSIS FOR CBF ACTIVATION STUDIES IN HUMAN BRAIN [J].
WORSLEY, KJ ;
EVANS, AC ;
MARRETT, S ;
NEELIN, P .
JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM, 1992, 12 (06) :900-918