SULFUR ISOTOPE DYNAMICS IN A HIGH-ELEVATION CATCHMENT, WEST GLACIER LAKE, WYOMING

被引:14
作者
FINLEY, JB
DREVER, JI
TURK, JT
机构
[1] UNIV WYOMING,DEPT GEOL & GEOPHYS,LARAMIE,WY 82071
[2] US GEOL SURVEY,DENVER FED CTR,DENVER,CO 80225
关键词
D O I
10.1007/BF01100439
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Stable isotopes of S are used in conjunction with dissolved SO42- concentrations to evaluate the utility of delta(34)S ratios in tracing contributions of bedrock-derived S to SO42- in runoff. Water samples were collected over the annual hydrograph from two tributaries in the West Glacier Lake, Wyoming, catchment. Concentrations of SO42- ranged from 12.6 to 43.0 mu eq L(-1); delta(34)S ratios ranged from -1.8 parts per thousand to +4.9 parts per thousand. The delta(34)S value of atmospherically derived SO42- is about +5.6 parts per thousand; four samples of pyrite from the bedrock had delta(34)S ratios that ranged from +0.7 to +4.1 parts per thousand. Concentrations of SO42- were inversely related to delta(34)S and discharge. The data for the tributary with the higher SO42- concentrations were reasonably consistent with mixing between atmospheric S and S from a bedrock source with a delta(34)S ratio of about -4.5 parts per thousand, The difference from the measured bedrock values presumably indicates that S isotopes in the bedrock pyrite are heterogeneously distributed. The data from the tributary with lower SO42- concentrations did not follow a two-component mixing line. Deviation from a two-component mixing line is most likely caused by preferential elution of SO42- from the snowpack during the early stages of snowmelt, although microbially mediated fractionation of S isotopes in the soil zone also may cause the deviation from the mixing line. Sulfur isotopes are useful in identifying whether or not there is a substantial contribution of bedrock S to runoff, but quantifying that contribution is problematic.
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 241
页数:15
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   IONIC TRACER MOVEMENT THROUGH A WYOMING SNOWPACK [J].
BALES, RC ;
SOMMERFELD, RA ;
KEBLER, DG .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT PART A-GENERAL TOPICS, 1990, 24 (11) :2749-2758
[2]   SULFATE BUDGET AND A MODEL FOR SULFATE CONCENTRATIONS IN STREAM WATER AT BIRKENES, A SMALL FORESTED CATCHMENT IN SOUTHERNMOST NORWAY [J].
CHRISTOPHERSEN, N ;
WRIGHT, RF .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1981, 17 (02) :377-389
[3]   ATMOSPHERIC SULFATE ADDITIONS AND CATION LEACHING IN A DOUGLAS-FIR ECOSYSTEM [J].
COLE, DW ;
JOHNSON, DW .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1977, 13 (02) :313-317
[4]   ISOTOPIC COMPOSITION OF SULFATE IN RAIN WATER,PISA, ITALY [J].
CORTECCI, G ;
LONGINEL.A .
EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS, 1970, 8 (01) :36-&
[5]   ORGANIC AND INORGANIC SULFUR CONSTITUENTS OF A FOREST SOIL AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP TO MICROBIAL ACTIVITY [J].
DAVID, MB ;
MITCHELL, MJ ;
NAKAS, JP .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1982, 46 (04) :847-852
[6]  
Drever J.I., 1988, GEOCHEMISTRY NATURAL
[8]  
FINLEY JB, 1993, APPL GEOCHEM S, V2, P185
[9]  
FULLER RD, 1986, WATER AIR SOIL POLL, V28, P163
[10]   SULFATE ADSORPTION AND DESORPTION REVERSIBILITY IN A VARIETY OF FOREST SOILS [J].
HARRISON, RB ;
JOHNSON, DW ;
TODD, DE .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 1989, 18 (04) :419-426