EXPOSURE OF NEONATAL RATS TO ALCOHOL BY VAPOR INHALATION DEMONSTRATES SPECIFICITY OF MICROCEPHALY AND PURKINJE-CELL LOSS BUT NOT ASTROGLIOSIS

被引:41
作者
RYABININ, AE [1 ]
COLE, M [1 ]
BLOOM, FE [1 ]
WILSON, MC [1 ]
机构
[1] Scripps Res Inst, RES INST, DEPT NEUROPHARMACOL, LA JOLLA, CA 92037 USA
关键词
ETHYL ALCOHOL; NEONATAL DEVELOPMENT; MICROCEPHALY; PURKINJE CELLS; GFAP;
D O I
10.1111/j.1530-0277.1995.tb01583.x
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
The artificial rearing model (AR) of fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS) has been shown to induce several major pathologies in the early postnatal rat brain development: microcephaly, selective neuronal cell loss, and activation of astroglia in the neocortex. The purpose of this study was to determine whether these pathologies were specific to the action of alcohol or, in contrast, could result from confounds attributed to this model of FAS. For this purpose, the pathological effects of AR were compared with those of a vapor inhalation (VI) model of FAS. Our studies showed that the microcephaly that developed after exposure to periodic blood alcohol levels (BALs) of 300-350 mg% during postnatal days 4-9 could be achieved by both AR and VI models of FAS, and thus is independent of the method of alcohol administration. In contrast, the gliosis measured by glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) mRNA levels in cortex, as well as by immunohistochemical staining for GFAP, was found only in the AR-FAS model, but not in the VI model. However, the lack of gliosis in VI was apparently not due to a less intrusive intervention of alcohol, because VI exposure resulted in a reduction in Purkinje cell number comparable with that found after AR or intragastric intubation of alcohol. Based on these observations, we conclude that the activation of gliosis observed after AR is not a specific effect of alcohol, but rather is caused by an interaction of alcohol with as yet unidentified factors present in AR.
引用
收藏
页码:784 / 791
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Jones WL, Smith DW, Recognition of the fetal alcohol syndrome, Lancet, 2, pp. 999-1001, (1973)
[2]  
Rosett HL, A clinical perspective of the fetal alcohol syndrome, Alcohol Clin Exp Res, 4, pp. 119-122, (1980)
[3]  
Rosett H, Weiner L, Alcohol and the Fetus: A Clinical Perspective, (1984)
[4]  
Abel EL, Sokol RJ, Incidence of fetal alcohol syndrome and economic impact of FAS‐related anomalities, Drug Alcohol Depend, 19, pp. 51-70, (1987)
[5]  
Levy M, Koren G, Obstetric and neonatal effects of drugs of abuse, Emerg Med North Am, 8, pp. 633-652, (1990)
[6]  
Dobbing J, Sands J, Comparative aspects of brain growth spurt, Early Hum Dev, 3, pp. 79-83, (1979)
[7]  
West JR, Fetal alcohol‐induced brain damage and the problem of determining temporal vulnerability: A review, Alcohol Drug Res, 7, pp. 423-441, (1987)
[8]  
Diaz J, Samson HH, Impaired brain growth in neonatal rat pups exposed to ethanol, Science, 208, pp. 751-753, (1980)
[9]  
West JR, Hamre KM, Pierce DR, Delay in brain growth induced by alcohol in artificially reared pups, Alcohol, 1, pp. 213-222, (1984)
[10]  
Goodlett CR, Mahoney JC, West J, Brain growth deficits following a single day of alcohol exposure in the neonatal rat, Alcohol, 6, pp. 121-126, (1989)