DEGREE-2, DEGREE-4, DEGREE-6 INFERRED FROM SEISMIC TOMOGRAPHY

被引:21
作者
MONTAGNER, JP [1 ]
ROMANOWICZ, B [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV CALIF BERKELEY,SEISMOG STN,BERKELEY,CA 94720
关键词
D O I
10.1029/92GL01204
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Lateral heterogneities of geophysical fields (gravity, magnetic, seismic velocities...) are usually expended into spherical harmonics. Free oscillation and geoid data show that heterogeneity in the deep Earth's mantle is dominated by degree 2. However, its geographical pattern and its location at depth is still questionable. Recent tomographic models of seismic velocity, anisotropy and anelasticity obtained from GEOSCOPE and GDSN data, make it possible to gain more insight on this problem. They show that at depth larger than 400km +/- 100km, the degree 2 and t a less extent, the degree 6 arise as the most important features. These new models also display a large degree 4 for radial anisotropy at large depths. A simple flow pattern can explain the predominance of these different degrees 2, 4, 6 and it is shown that degrees 2, 4, 6 in the transition zone are not independent. They are compared to the corresponding degrees of the hotspot distribution and geoid. A possible relation between the degree 2 of velocity and the degree 4 of radial anisotropy is also displayed. However, the different location of degree 2 in the upper mantle and the lower mantle is still puzzling.
引用
收藏
页码:631 / 634
页数:4
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   UPPERMANTLE ANISOTROPY AND THE OCEANIC LITHOSPHERE [J].
ANDERSON, DL ;
REGAN, J .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 1983, 10 (09) :841-844
[2]  
BERCOVICI D, 1991, AUG IUGG M VIENN
[3]   GLOBAL COUPLING OF EARTH SURFACE-TOPOGRAPHY WITH HOTSPOTS, GEOID AND MANTLE HETEROGENEITIES [J].
CAZENAVE, A ;
SOURIAU, A ;
DOMINH, K .
NATURE, 1989, 340 (6228) :54-57
[4]   KINEMATIC MODELS OF LARGE-SCALE FLOW IN THE EARTHS MANTLE [J].
HAGER, BH ;
OCONNELL, RJ .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, 1979, 84 (NB3) :1031-1048
[5]   CAN PURE-PATH MODELS EXPLAIN FREE OSCILLATION DATA [J].
KAWAKATSU, H .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 1983, 10 (03) :186-189
[6]   GRAVITY MODEL IMPROVEMENT USING GEOS-3 (GEM-9 AND GEM-10) [J].
LERCH, FJ ;
KLOSKO, SM ;
LAUBSCHER, RE ;
WAGNER, CA .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, 1979, 84 (NB8) :3897-3916
[7]   ASPHERICAL EARTH STRUCTURE FROM FUNDAMENTAL SPHEROIDAL-MODE DATA [J].
MASTERS, G ;
JORDAN, TH ;
SILVER, PG ;
GILBERT, F .
NATURE, 1982, 298 (5875) :609-613
[8]   GLOBAL ANISOTROPY IN THE UPPER MANTLE INFERRED FROM THE REGIONALIZATION OF PHASE VELOCITIES [J].
MONTAGNER, JP ;
TANIMOTO, T .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH AND PLANETS, 1990, 95 (B4) :4797-4819
[9]   CONSTRAINED REFERENCE MANTLE MODEL [J].
MONTAGNER, JP ;
ANDERSON, DL .
PHYSICS OF THE EARTH AND PLANETARY INTERIORS, 1989, 58 (2-3) :205-227
[10]  
MONTAGNER JP, 1991, IN PRESS J GEOPHYS R