HUMAN ERROR IDENTIFICATION IN HUMAN RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT .2. DETAILED COMPARISON OF TECHNIQUES

被引:77
作者
KIRWAN, B
机构
[1] Industrial Ergonomics Group, School of Manufacturing and Mechanical Engineering, Birmingham University
关键词
HUMAN ERROR; RISK ASSESSMENT; HUMAN RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT;
D O I
10.1016/0003-6870(92)90368-6
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This is the second part of a two-part review of human error identification (HEI) approaches in human reliability assessment (HRA). Part 1 reviewed the probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) context in which HRA occurs, and then detailed 12 HEI techniques which have evolved in the field of HRA. Part 2 attempts to compare the way these techniques perform against a range of criteria relevant to HEI theoretical and empirical validity, and practical usefulness in applied HRA. It is hoped that these comparisons will help assessors in the selection of techniques for practical applications. The comparisons also point to research and development needs in the area of applied HEI.
引用
收藏
页码:371 / 381
页数:11
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1983, HDB HUMAN RELIABILIT
[2]  
APOSTOLAKIS GE, 1990, RELIABILITY ENG SYST, V29
[3]  
EMBREY DE, 1986, CHEM IND-LONDON, P454
[4]  
EMBREY DE, 1986, INT TOPICAL M ADV HU
[5]  
Fleishman E. A., 1984, TAXONOMIES HUMAN PER
[6]  
GALL W, 1988, ERROR ANAL
[7]  
KIRWAN B, 1988, RTS8895Q NCSR UKAEA
[8]  
Kirwan B, 1989, RELIABILITY 89
[9]  
KIRWAN B, 1990, SEP SAF REL S ALTR
[10]  
KLETZ T, 1974, HAZOP HAZAN NOTES ID