Standards for health promotion in hospitals: development and pilot test in nine European countries

被引:32
作者
Groene, O. [1 ]
Jorgensen, S. J. [2 ]
Fugleholm, A. M. [3 ]
Moller, L. [4 ]
Garcia-Barbero, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] WHO European Off Integrated Hlth Care Serv, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Bispebjerg Hosp, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Hillerod Hosp, Hillerod, Denmark
[4] Bispebjerg Hosp, Danish Network Hlth Promoting Hosp, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
Health services; Standards; Hospitals; Self assessment; Quality improvement;
D O I
10.1108/09526860510602569
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose - To describe the process of development of standards for health promotion in hospitals, including pilot study, method and results. Design/methodology/approach - A set of standards for health promotion in hospitals was developed by a task force of the International Network of Health Promoting Hospitals, following the recommendations of the ALPHA programme. The standards were pilot tested and assessed qualitatively and quantitatively in 36 hospitals in nine European countries. Subsequently, standards were reviewed by representatives from the piloting hospitals. A self-assessment tool was produced to evaluate whether hospital managers and professionals perceive the standards to be relevant and applicable and whether they are currently met. Participants provided comments from their national health system perspective and rated the standards. Findings - General comments and specific comments were provided for each standard regarding its relevance, applicability and current level of compliance. A total of 35 standards' criteria were assessed and 86 per cent (30/35) were rated > 80 per cent relevant and applicable, while 14 per cent (5/35) were rated > 60 per cent relevant. The degree of current fulfilment of the criteria, however, was low. Research limitations/implications - While the standards should be applicable to other regions (South America, Africa, Asia) additional testing may be required to adapt them to prevailing health care challenges. Practical implications - The pilot test revealed that the standards are applicable and were considered relevant, and showed that current compliance is low. It also showed that there is a clear need to facilitate continuous monitoring and improvement of compliance. The standards are regarded as being public domain, are applicable to other organisations and can be incorporated into existing quality systems. Originality/value - Standards are a common tool for quality assurance in health care, but so far have considered health promotion activities only partly, if at all. The standards for health promotion in hospitals developed by WHO fill this important gap.
引用
收藏
页码:300 / +
页数:10
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]
Australian Council on Healthcare Standards, 1999, EQUIP GUID STAND GUI
[2]
Canadian Council on Health Services Accreditation, 1999, STAND
[3]
Clinical Standards Board for Scotland, 2001, GEN STAND
[4]
Florin D, 2000, EVALUATING HLTH PROM, P140
[5]
*INT SOC QUAL HLTH, 2000, INT STAND HLTH CAR A
[6]
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, 2000, STAND HOSP
[7]
Jolliffe J.A., 2001, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI [DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD001800, 10.1002/14651858.CD001800]
[8]
Pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [J].
Lacasse, Y. ;
Goldstein, R. ;
Lasserson, T. J. ;
Martins, S. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2006, (04)
[9]
Effect of preoperative smoking intervention on postoperative complications: a randomised clinical trial [J].
Moller, AM ;
Villebro, N ;
Pedersen, T ;
Tonnesen, H .
LANCET, 2002, 359 (9301) :114-117
[10]
Pelikan J. M., 1998, PATHWAYS HLTH PROMOT