OPTIMAL CORRECTION FOR CONTINUITY IN THE CHI-SQUARED TEST IN 2X2 TABLES (CONDITIONED METHOD)

被引:10
作者
ANDRES, AM
TEJEDOR, IH
DELCASTILLO, JDL
机构
[1] UNIV GRANADA,FAC MED,CATEDRA BIOESTADIST,E-18071 GRANADA,SPAIN
[2] UNIV COMPLUTENSE MADRID,FAC MED,CATEDRA BIOESTADIST,E-28040 MADRID,SPAIN
关键词
CHI-SQUARED TEST; CONDITIONED METHOD; CORRECTION FOR CONTINUITY; FISHER EXACT TEST; 2X2; TABLES;
D O I
10.1080/03610919208813066
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
The most common asymptotic procedure for analyzing a 2 x 2 table (under the conditioning principle) is the chi-squared test with correction for continuity (c.f.c). According to the way this is applied, up to the present f our methods have been obtained: one for one-tailed tests (Yates') and three for two-tailed tests (those of Mantel, Conover and Haber). In this paper two further methods are defined (one for each case), the 6 resulting methods are grouped in families, their individual behaviour studied and the optimal is selected. The conclusions are established on the assumption that the method studied is applied indiscriminately (without being subjected to validity conditions), and taking a basis of 400,000 tables (with the values of sample size n between 20 and 300 and exact P-values between 1% and 10%) and a criterion of evaluation based on the percentage of times in which the approximate P-value differs from the exact (Fisher's exact test) by an excessive amount. The optimal c.f.c. depends on n, on E (the minimum quantity expected) and on the error a to be used, but the rule of selection is not complicated and the new methods proposed are frequently selected. In the paper we also study what occurs when E greater-than-or-equal-to 5, as well as whether the chi-squared statistic to be used should be multiplied by factor n or by factor (n-1).
引用
收藏
页码:1077 / 1101
页数:25
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   A REVIEW OF CLASSIC NONASYMPTOTIC METHODS FOR COMPARING 2 PROPORTIONS BY MEANS OF INDEPENDENT SAMPLES [J].
ANDRES, AM .
COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-SIMULATION AND COMPUTATION, 1991, 20 (2-3) :551-583
[2]  
ANDRES AM, 1992, IN PRESS COMMUN STAT, V21
[3]  
ARMITAGE P, 1971, STATISTICAL METHODS
[4]  
BARNARD GA, 1947, BIOMETRIKA, V34, P123, DOI 10.1093/biomet/34.1-2.123
[5]   ON ALLEGED GAINS IN POWER FROM LOWER P-VALUES [J].
BARNARD, GA .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1989, 8 (12) :1469-1477
[6]  
BERRES M, 1983, BIOMETRICAL J, P527
[7]   SOME METHODS FOR STRENGTHENING THE COMMON X2 TESTS [J].
COCHRAN, WG .
BIOMETRICS, 1954, 10 (04) :417-451
[8]   SOME REASONS FOR NOT USING YATES CONTINUITY CORRECTION ON 2X2 CONTINGENCY-TABLES [J].
CONOVER, WJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1974, 69 (346) :374-376
[9]   CONTINUITY CORRECTION [J].
COX, DR .
BIOMETRIKA, 1970, 57 (01) :217-&
[10]  
DELCASTILLO JDL, 1987, TRABAJOS ESTADISTICA, V2, P15